Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic FZ300
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f83bd/f83bdf39352a979ef5fa8b296f80d35d80574119" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 front Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eb0e7/eb0e7d68430f7af24efc1c439232dbd28d053d73" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300 front"
59 Imaging
37 Features
73 Overall
51
Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic FZ300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Introduced February 2010
- Alternate Name is mju Tough 6020
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1/16000s Maximum Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F2.8) lens
- 691g - 132 x 92 x 117mm
- Launched July 2015
- Old Model is Panasonic FZ200
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic FZ300 Overview
On this page, we are comparing the Olympus 6020 versus Panasonic FZ300, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the 6020 (13MP) and the FZ300 (12MP) is fairly well matched and both cameras provide the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The 6020 was introduced 6 years prior to the FZ300 which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus 6020 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FZ300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the 6020 grades versus the FZ300 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic FZ300 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus 6020 Gallery & Panasonic FZ300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Panasonic FZ300
6020 | FZ300 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ300 over the Olympus 6020
FZ300 | 6020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | July 2015 | ![]() | February 2010 | More modern by 66 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+810k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus 6020 and Panasonic FZ300
6020 | FZ300 |
---|
Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic FZ300 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry around your camera frequently, you will have to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus 6020 features outside dimensions of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FZ300 has measurements of 132mm x 92mm x 117mm (5.2" x 3.6" x 4.6") having a weight of 691 grams (1.52 lbs).
Check the Olympus 6020 versus Panasonic FZ300 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you select at that time. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the 6020 compared to the FZ300.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7ab7/b7ab7d055d95a1c64eb7827f28bffd607f63537c" alt="Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic FZ300 size comparison Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic FZ300 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability score of the 6020 and FZ300 is 95 and 59 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e189f/e189f99d8bb4bb844f4ccbc13c5f415fe2b0e8c5" alt="Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic FZ300 top view buttons comparison Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic FZ300 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic FZ300 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's tough to picture the difference between sensor sizes merely by looking at specifications. The pic below might give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the 6020 and FZ300.
To sum up, both of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You can anticipate the Olympus 6020 to resolve extra detail using its extra 1MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics more aggressively. The more aged 6020 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86fd8/86fd89b4b51a151c63e6ab7b8159b383ea30ceda" alt="Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic FZ300 sensor size comparison Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic FZ300 sensor size comparison"
Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic FZ300 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e4ce1/e4ce185a3ab4120f52c1f1530ba3565869a5bd4e" alt="Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic FZ300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic FZ300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic FZ300 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300 |
Also called | mju Tough 6020 | - |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2010-02-02 | 2015-07-16 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 13 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.8 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 1,040 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,440 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1/4 secs | 60 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/16000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames per second | 12.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 8.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, forced on, forced on w/redeye reduction, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction, forced off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 122 gr (0.27 pounds) | 691 gr (1.52 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 132 x 92 x 117mm (5.2" x 3.6" x 4.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 380 photos |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail pricing | $279 | $598 |