Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic FZ35
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
72 Imaging
35 Features
37 Overall
35
Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic FZ35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Introduced February 2010
- Other Name is mju Tough 6020
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-486mm (F2.8-4.4) lens
- 397g - 118 x 76 x 89mm
- Introduced July 2010
- Additionally Known as Lumix DMC-FZ38
Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic FZ35 Overview
Below is a detailed analysis of the Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic FZ35, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the 6020 (13MP) and the FZ35 (12MP) is fairly comparable and they possess the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe 6020 was manufactured 5 months before the FZ35 so they are both of a similar age. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus 6020 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FZ35 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving through a more detailed comparison, below is a brief summation of how the 6020 scores versus the FZ35 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic FZ35 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35. The entire galleries are available at Olympus 6020 Gallery & Panasonic FZ35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Panasonic FZ35
6020 | FZ35 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ35 over the Olympus 6020
FZ35 | 6020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial precise focusing |
Common features in the Olympus 6020 and Panasonic FZ35
6020 | FZ35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2010 | July 2010 | Same age | |
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimension | 2.7" | 2.7" | Identical display size | |
Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Same display resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic FZ35 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you have to consider its weight and size. The Olympus 6020 has got external dimensions of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs) while the Panasonic FZ35 has specifications of 118mm x 76mm x 89mm (4.6" x 3.0" x 3.5") with a weight of 397 grams (0.88 lbs).
Examine the Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic FZ35 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are working with at the time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the 6020 and the FZ35.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the 6020 and FZ35 is 95 and 72 respectively.
Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic FZ35 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is tough to imagine the contrast in sensor measurements just by going through specs. The visual here may provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the 6020 and FZ35.
All in all, both of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You can anticipate the Olympus 6020 to provide greater detail due to its extra 1 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos much more aggressively.
Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic FZ35 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic FZ35 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 |
Other name | mju Tough 6020 | Lumix DMC-FZ38 |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2010-02-02 | 2010-07-06 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | Venus Engine V |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 13 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 27-486mm (18.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.8-4.4 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7" | 2.7" |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1/4 secs | 60 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | 8.50 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264 | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 122 grams (0.27 pounds) | 397 grams (0.88 pounds) |
Dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 118 x 76 x 89mm (4.6" x 3.0" x 3.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | Li-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 pictures)) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $279 | $999 |