Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic G95
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
67 Imaging
62 Features
88 Overall
72
Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic G95 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Revealed February 2010
- Additionally Known as mju Tough 6020
(Full Review)
- 20.3MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 536g - 130 x 94 x 77mm
- Introduced April 2019
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-G90
- Older Model is Panasonic G85
Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic G95 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic G95, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a significant gap between the image resolutions of the 6020 (13MP) and G95 (20.3MP) and the 6020 (1/2.3") and G95 (Four Thirds) posses totally different sensor measurements.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe 6020 was released 10 years prior to the G95 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus 6020 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic G95 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a simple view of how the 6020 grades versus the G95 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic G95 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-G95. The complete galleries are available at Olympus 6020 Gallery and Panasonic G95 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Panasonic G95
6020 | G95 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic G95 over the Olympus 6020
G95 | 6020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | April 2019 | February 2010 | Fresher by 111 months | |
Manual focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1240k | 230k | Sharper display (+1010k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus 6020 and Panasonic G95
6020 | G95 |
---|
Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic G95 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry your camera regularly, you have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus 6020 has external dimensions of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Panasonic G95 has proportions of 130mm x 94mm x 77mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 3.0") with a weight of 536 grams (1.18 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic G95 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have attached at that moment. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the 6020 compared to the G95.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the 6020 and G95 is 95 and 67 respectively.
Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic G95 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to envision the difference between sensor sizing merely by checking technical specs. The graphic below will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the 6020 and G95.
As you can tell, both cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The 6020 because of its tinier sensor will make shooting shallow DOF more difficult and the Panasonic G95 will resolve more detail as a result of its extra 7.3MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The older 6020 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic G95 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic G95 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-G95 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-G95 |
Also called as | mju Tough 6020 | Lumix DMC-G90 |
Class | Waterproof | Advanced Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2010-02-02 | 2019-04-05 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 13 megapixels | 20.3 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5184 x 3888 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 200 |
RAW data | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display size | 2.7" | 3" |
Display resolution | 230k dots | 1,240k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1/4s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Highest quiet shutter speed | - | 1/16000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames per second | 9.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 6.40 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 122g (0.27 lb) | 536g (1.18 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 130 x 94 x 77mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 290 photographs |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 10 secs x 3 shots) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-II supported) |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $279 | $998 |