Olympus 6020 vs Pentax 645D
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
50 Imaging
76 Features
52 Overall
66
Olympus 6020 vs Pentax 645D Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Launched February 2010
- Also Known as mju Tough 6020
(Full Review)
- 40MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 1600
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- No Video
- Pentax 645AF2 Mount
- 1480g - 156 x 117 x 119mm
- Revealed March 2010
- Successor is Pentax 645Z
Olympus 6020 vs Pentax 645D Overview
Lets look more closely at the Olympus 6020 and Pentax 645D, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Pro DSLR by companies Olympus and Pentax. There exists a substantial gap between the resolutions of the 6020 (13MP) and 645D (40MP) and the 6020 (1/2.3") and 645D (Medium format) offer different sensor sizing.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe 6020 was manufactured within a month of the 645D so they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus 6020 being a Compact camera and the Pentax 645D being a Large SLR camera.
Before getting right into a full comparison, here is a concise overview of how the 6020 matches up against the 645D for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus 6020 vs Pentax 645D Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 & Pentax 645D. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus 6020 Gallery & Pentax 645D Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Pentax 645D
6020 | 645D |
---|
Reasons to pick Pentax 645D over the Olympus 6020
645D | 6020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 921k | 230k | Clearer display (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 6020 and Pentax 645D
6020 | 645D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2010 | March 2010 | Similar age | |
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither features Touch display |
Olympus 6020 vs Pentax 645D Physical Comparison
In case you're going to lug around your camera often, you should think about its weight and size. The Olympus 6020 enjoys outer measurements of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs) while the Pentax 645D has specifications of 156mm x 117mm x 119mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 4.7") with a weight of 1480 grams (3.26 lbs).
Check the Olympus 6020 and Pentax 645D in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the 6020 against the 645D.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the 6020 and 645D is 95 and 50 respectively.
Olympus 6020 vs Pentax 645D Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its hard to imagine the contrast between sensor measurements purely by reading technical specs. The visual below might give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the 6020 and 645D.
As you have seen, both cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The 6020 featuring a tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF trickier and the Pentax 645D will offer you more detail due to its extra 27MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images more aggressively.
Olympus 6020 vs Pentax 645D Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 6020 vs Pentax 645D Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Pentax 645D | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Pentax 645D |
Also Known as | mju Tough 6020 | - |
Type | Waterproof | Pro DSLR |
Launched | 2010-02-02 | 2010-03-10 |
Body design | Compact | Large SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | Prime II |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Medium format |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 44 x 33mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 1,452.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 13 megapixels | 40 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 7264 x 5440 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 200 |
RAW files | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Pentax 645AF2 |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 6 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 0.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD with wide-viewing angle and with AR coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 98% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.85x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1/4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 5.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/125 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video format | H.264 | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 122 grams (0.27 pounds) | 1480 grams (3.26 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 156 x 117 x 119mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 4.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 82 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 24.6 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1262 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 800 shots |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-50B | D-LI90 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | 1 | Two |
Cost at release | $279 | $4,000 |