Olympus 6020 vs Pentax K-1 II
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
55 Imaging
78 Features
82 Overall
79
Olympus 6020 vs Pentax K-1 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Released February 2010
- Alternative Name is mju Tough 6020
(Full Review)
- 36MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.2" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 819200
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax KAF4 Mount
- 1010g - 137 x 110 x 86mm
- Released February 2018
- Old Model is Pentax K-1
Olympus 6020 vs Pentax K-1 II Overview
Lets examine more in depth at the Olympus 6020 and Pentax K-1 II, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by companies Olympus and Pentax. There exists a crucial gap among the image resolutions of the 6020 (13MP) and K-1 II (36MP) and the 6020 (1/2.3") and K-1 II (Full frame) possess totally different sensor measurements.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe 6020 was unveiled 9 years prior to the K-1 II which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus 6020 being a Compact camera and the Pentax K-1 II being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before delving through a in-depth comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the 6020 scores versus the K-1 II when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus 6020 vs Pentax K-1 II Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 and Pentax K-1 Mark II. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus 6020 Gallery and Pentax K-1 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Pentax K-1 II
6020 | K-1 II |
---|
Reasons to pick Pentax K-1 II over the Olympus 6020
K-1 II | 6020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2018 | February 2010 | More modern by 98 months | |
Manual focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen sizing | 3.2" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 230k | Crisper screen (+807k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 6020 and Pentax K-1 II
6020 | K-1 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither contains Touch screen |
Olympus 6020 vs Pentax K-1 II Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus 6020 has got external dimensions of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs) while the Pentax K-1 II has dimensions of 137mm x 110mm x 86mm (5.4" x 4.3" x 3.4") with a weight of 1010 grams (2.23 lbs).
Examine the Olympus 6020 and Pentax K-1 II in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at the time. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the 6020 against the K-1 II.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the 6020 and K-1 II is 95 and 55 respectively.
Olympus 6020 vs Pentax K-1 II Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its difficult to see the difference in sensor sizes purely by researching technical specs. The image here may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the 6020 and K-1 II.
As you have seen, both of those cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The 6020 using its smaller sensor will make getting shallower DOF more challenging and the Pentax K-1 II will result in more detail having an extra 23MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The more aged 6020 will be behind in sensor technology.
Olympus 6020 vs Pentax K-1 II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 6020 vs Pentax K-1 II Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Pentax K-1 Mark II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Pentax K-1 Mark II |
Also called as | mju Tough 6020 | - |
Category | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
Released | 2010-02-02 | 2018-02-22 |
Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | PRIME IV |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 861.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 13 megapixel | 36 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 7360 x 4912 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 819200 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 33 |
Cross focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Pentax KAF4 |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 151 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3.2 inch |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 1,037 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1/4 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 5.0fps | 4.4fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto Flash Discharge, Auto Flash + Red-eye Reduction, Flash On, Flash On + Red-eye Reduction, Slow-speed Sync, Slow-speed Sync + Red-eye, P-TTL, Trailing Curtain Sync, Contrast-control-sync, High-speed sync, Wireless sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/200 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Auto Flash Discharge, Auto Flash + Red-eye Reduction, Flash On, Flash On + Red-eye Reduction, Slow-speed Sync, Slow-speed Sync + Red-eye, P-TTL, Trailing Curtain Sync, Contrast-control-sync, High-speed sync, Wireless sync |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Built-in |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 122 gr (0.27 lb) | 1010 gr (2.23 lb) |
Dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 137 x 110 x 86mm (5.4" x 4.3" x 3.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 670 images |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-50B | D-LI90 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I) |
Storage slots | Single | Two |
Retail cost | $279 | $1,737 |