Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GR
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34


90 Imaging
57 Features
54 Overall
55
Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Launched February 2010
- Additionally Known as mju Tough 6020
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8) lens
- 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
- Announced April 2013
- Refreshed by Ricoh GR II

Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GR Overview
Following is a detailed comparison of the Olympus 6020 versus Ricoh GR, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the 6020 (13MP) and the GR (16MP) is pretty close but the 6020 (1/2.3") and GR (APS-C) offer different sensor size.

The 6020 was launched 4 years earlier than the GR which is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus 6020 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving into a full comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the 6020 grades versus the GR in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GR Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 and Ricoh GR. The complete galleries are available at Olympus 6020 Gallery and Ricoh GR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Ricoh GR
6020 | GR |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Olympus 6020
GR | 6020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | April 2013 | ![]() | February 2010 | More modern by 39 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 1230k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+1000k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 6020 and Ricoh GR
6020 | GR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither features Touch screen |
Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GR Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry around your camera, you will have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus 6020 enjoys external measurements of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GR has dimensions of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") and a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Check the Olympus 6020 versus Ricoh GR in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are working with during that time. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the 6020 and the GR.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the 6020 and GR is 95 and 90 respectively.

Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GR Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's tough to imagine the contrast in sensor sizes purely by researching specifications. The image below might give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the 6020 and GR.
To sum up, both of those cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The 6020 due to its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF tougher and the Ricoh GR will provide you with greater detail utilizing its extra 3 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs way more aggressively. The more aged 6020 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.

Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GR Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GR Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Ricoh GR | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Ricoh GR |
Otherwise known as | mju Tough 6020 | - |
Type | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2010-02-02 | 2013-04-17 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 372.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 13 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4928 x 3264 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.8 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 1,230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1/4 seconds | 300 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames per sec | 4.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 5.40 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/4000 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 122 grams (0.27 lb) | 245 grams (0.54 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 78 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.6 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.5 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 972 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 290 photos |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-50B | DB65 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD, SDHC, SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $279 | $971 |