Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GR Digital III
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34


92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Released February 2010
- Also Known as mju Tough 6020
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Introduced July 2009
- New Model is Ricoh GR Digital IV

Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Overview
On this page, we are reviewing the Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GR Digital III, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. There is a substantial difference among the image resolutions of the 6020 (13MP) and GR Digital III (10MP) and the 6020 (1/2.3") and GR Digital III (1/1.7") boast totally different sensor sizing.

The 6020 was announced 7 months after the GR Digital III which means that they are of a similar age. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a thorough comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the 6020 scores against the GR Digital III when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 & Ricoh GR Digital III. The whole galleries are available at Olympus 6020 Gallery & Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Ricoh GR Digital III
6020 | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2010 | ![]() | July 2009 | Newer by 7 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Olympus 6020
GR Digital III | 6020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 6020 and Ricoh GR Digital III
6020 | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch display |
Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Physical Comparison
When you are going to travel with your camera often, you will have to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus 6020 comes with outer dimensions of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Ricoh GR Digital III has proportions of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") and a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GR Digital III in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilising at the time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the 6020 vs the GR Digital III.

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the 6020 and GR Digital III is 95 and 92 respectively.

Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very hard to visualise the difference in sensor dimensions only by going through specifications. The picture here may give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the 6020 and GR Digital III.
Plainly, both cameras have different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The 6020 having a smaller sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field more challenging and the Olympus 6020 will show more detail with its extra 3 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The newer 6020 will have a benefit in sensor tech.

Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Ricoh GR Digital III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Ricoh GR Digital III |
Otherwise known as | mju Tough 6020 | - |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2010-02-02 | 2009-07-27 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | GR engine III |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 13MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 64 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/1.9 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1/4 secs | 1 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 3.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video data format | H.264 | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 122g (0.27 lbs) | 208g (0.46 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | Li-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $279 | $399 |