Clicky

Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV

Portability
95
Imaging
36
Features
32
Overall
34
Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 front
 
Ricoh GR Digital IV front
Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
47
Overall
39

Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs

Olympus 6020
(Full Review)
  • 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
  • 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
  • Released February 2010
  • Other Name is mju Tough 6020
Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28mm (F1.9) lens
  • 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
  • Released September 2011
  • Old Model is Ricoh GR Digital III
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview

Below, we are reviewing the Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a large gap among the sensor resolutions of the 6020 (13MP) and GR Digital IV (10MP) and the 6020 (1/2.3") and GR Digital IV (1/1.7") use different sensor sizing.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The 6020 was unveiled 19 months earlier than the GR Digital IV making the cameras a generation away from one another. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before getting straight into a thorough comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the 6020 matches up versus the GR Digital IV with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV

 6020 GR Digital IV 

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Olympus 6020

 GR Digital IV 6020 
ReleasedSeptember 2011February 2010More modern by 19 months
Focus manually Very precise focus
Display dimension3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution1230k230kSharper display (+1000k dot)

Common features in the Olympus 6020 and Ricoh GR Digital IV

 6020 GR Digital IV 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither provides Touch friendly display

Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison

For anybody who is looking to carry around your camera, you will have to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus 6020 provides outside dimensions of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Ricoh GR Digital IV has measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") having a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).

Check the Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are using during that time. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the 6020 versus the GR Digital IV.

Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the 6020 and GR Digital IV is 95 and 92 respectively.

Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV top view buttons comparison

Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it can be tough to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes only by going through specs. The pic underneath may provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the 6020 and GR Digital IV.

All in all, each of the cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The 6020 with its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF more challenging and the Olympus 6020 will produce more detail having an extra 3MP. Greater resolution will help you crop pics much more aggressively. The more aged 6020 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV sensor size comparison

Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus 6020 as a Portrait photography camera
Ricoh GR Digital IV as a Portrait photography camera
28
decent megapixels (13MP)
manual focus not available
lack of manual exposure
cannot use external flash
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
41
focusing manually
supports RAW files
megapixel count low (10MP)
tiny sensor (1/1.7")
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Street Comparison

Olympus 6020 Street photography info
Ricoh GR Digital IV Street photography info
66
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proof
lighter than competition (122 grams)
no articulating screen
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
65
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW files
fixed screen
tiny sensor (1/1.7")
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Olympus 6020 Sports photography advice
Ricoh GR Digital IV Sports photography advice
43
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (13MP)
provides tracking autofocus
environment proof
max frames per second low (5.0 fps)
lack of shutter priority mode
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
34
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
better than average battery pack (390 shots)
focal length is fixed (28mm)
megapixel count low (10MP)
tiny sensor (1/1.7")
has no phase detect AF
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Olympus 6020 Travel photography advice
Ricoh GR Digital IV Travel photography advice
70
lighter than competition (122g)
environment proof
decent megapixels (13 megapixels)
has built in flash
rather wide (28mm)
lack of Timelapse recording
does not contain selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f3.9)
67
better than average battery pack (390 per charge)
built-in flash
great max aperture (f1.9)
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus 6020
Landscape photography with Ricoh GR Digital IV
40
rather wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (13 megapixels)
environment proof
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.9)
screen is small (2.7")
lack of manual exposure
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
lack of Timelapse recording
53
focusing manually
great max aperture (f1.9)
screen size is good (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW files
better than average battery pack (390 CIPA)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (28mm)
megapixel count low (10MP)
tiny sensor (1/1.7")
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus 6020 as a Vlogging camera
Ricoh GR Digital IV as a Vlogging camera
31
rather wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (122g)
sluggish max aperture (f3.9)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of external microphone port
29
great max aperture (f1.9)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low video resolution (640 x 480 resolution)
does not have external mic support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus 6020 and Ricoh GR Digital IV
 Olympus Stylus Tough 6020Ricoh GR Digital IV
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 Ricoh GR Digital IV
Otherwise known as mju Tough 6020 -
Category Waterproof Small Sensor Compact
Released 2010-02-02 2011-09-15
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic III -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/1.7"
Sensor dimensions 6.08 x 4.56mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor area 27.7mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 13 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Max resolution 4288 x 3216 3648 x 2736
Max native ISO 1600 3200
Minimum native ISO 64 80
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-140mm (5.0x) 28mm (1x)
Maximal aperture f/3.9-5.9 f/1.9
Macro focus distance 1cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.9 4.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.7 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 230k dots 1,230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Optical (optional)
Features
Min shutter speed 1/4 seconds 1 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 5.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 4.00 m 3.00 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video data format H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 122g (0.27 pounds) 190g (0.42 pounds)
Dimensions 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 390 images
Battery style - Battery Pack
Battery model Li-50B DB65
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 seconds) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC, Internal SD/SDHC, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Launch cost $279 $599