Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV
95 Imaging
35 Features
32 Overall
33


92 Imaging
34 Features
47 Overall
39
Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Released February 2010
- Other Name is mju Tough 6020
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Released September 2011
- Old Model is Ricoh GR Digital III

Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview
Below, we are reviewing the Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a large gap among the sensor resolutions of the 6020 (13MP) and GR Digital IV (10MP) and the 6020 (1/2.3") and GR Digital IV (1/1.7") use different sensor sizing.

The 6020 was unveiled 19 months earlier than the GR Digital IV making the cameras a generation away from one another. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a thorough comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the 6020 matches up versus the GR Digital IV with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 & Ricoh GR Digital IV. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus 6020 Gallery & Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
6020 | GR Digital IV |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Olympus 6020
GR Digital IV | 6020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2011 | ![]() | February 2010 | More modern by 19 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 1230k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+1000k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 6020 and Ricoh GR Digital IV
6020 | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry around your camera, you will have to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus 6020 provides outside dimensions of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Ricoh GR Digital IV has measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") having a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Check the Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are using during that time. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the 6020 versus the GR Digital IV.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the 6020 and GR Digital IV is 95 and 92 respectively.

Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be tough to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes only by going through specs. The pic underneath may provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the 6020 and GR Digital IV.
All in all, each of the cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The 6020 with its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF more challenging and the Olympus 6020 will produce more detail having an extra 3MP. Greater resolution will help you crop pics much more aggressively. The more aged 6020 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Ricoh GR Digital IV | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Ricoh GR Digital IV |
Otherwise known as | mju Tough 6020 | - |
Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2010-02-02 | 2011-09-15 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 13 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/1.9 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 1,230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1/4 seconds | 1 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | 3.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 122g (0.27 pounds) | 190g (0.42 pounds) |
Dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 390 images |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-50B | DB65 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $279 | $599 |