Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GR II
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
89 Imaging
59 Features
55 Overall
57
Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GR II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Announced February 2010
- Alternate Name is mju Tough 6020
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16.0) lens
- 251g - 117 x 63 x 35mm
- Revealed June 2015
- Old Model is Ricoh GR
Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GR II Overview
Following is a in-depth analysis of the Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GR II, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the 6020 (13MP) and the GR II (16MP) is relatively close but the 6020 (1/2.3") and GR II (APS-C) use totally different sensor measurements.
Photography GlossaryThe 6020 was brought out 6 years earlier than the GR II which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus 6020 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GR II being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before going in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the 6020 scores vs the GR II when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GR II Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 & Ricoh GR II. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus 6020 Gallery & Ricoh GR II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Ricoh GR II
6020 | GR II |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR II over the Olympus 6020
GR II | 6020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | June 2015 | February 2010 | More modern by 65 months | |
Manually focus | More exact focusing | |||
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 1230k | 230k | Clearer screen (+1000k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 6020 and Ricoh GR II
6020 | GR II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Lacking Touch screen |
Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GR II Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry around your camera frequently, you have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus 6020 has got exterior dimensions of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs) while the Ricoh GR II has dimensions of 117mm x 63mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") with a weight of 251 grams (0.55 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GR II in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the 6020 versus the GR II.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the 6020 and GR II is 95 and 89 respectively.
Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GR II Sensor Comparison
Generally, its difficult to see the difference in sensor sizes simply by viewing specifications. The picture underneath may give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the 6020 and GR II.
Plainly, both of those cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The 6020 due to its smaller sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field more challenging and the Ricoh GR II will provide you with greater detail having its extra 3MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The more aged 6020 will be behind in sensor innovation.
Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GR II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GR II Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Ricoh GR II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Ricoh GR II |
Also called | mju Tough 6020 | - |
Class | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2010-02-02 | 2015-06-17 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | GR Engine V |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 372.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 13MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4928 x 3264 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Max aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.8-16.0 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 10cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 1,230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1/4s | 300s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0fps | 4.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 3.00 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, Flash On, Flash Synchro., Manual Flash, Red-Eye Flash Auto, Red-Eye Flash On, Red-Eye Flash Synchro, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p, 24p) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 122 gr (0.27 lb) | 251 gr (0.55 lb) |
Dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 117 x 63 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 80 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.6 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.7 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1078 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 320 photographs |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-50B | DB-65 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $279 | $599 |