Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GR III
95 Imaging
35 Features
32 Overall
33


90 Imaging
68 Features
62 Overall
65
Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GR III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Released February 2010
- Also Known as mju Tough 6020
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 102400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
- 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
- Announced September 2018
- Earlier Model is Ricoh GR III
- Successor is Ricoh GR III

Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GR III Overview
Below is a comprehensive review of the Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GR III, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a significant gap among the image resolutions of the 6020 (13MP) and GR III (24MP) and the 6020 (1/2.3") and GR III (APS-C) use different sensor measurements.

The 6020 was launched 9 years earlier than the GR III and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus 6020 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GR III being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before we go in to a thorough comparison, below is a simple summation of how the 6020 grades against the GR III in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GR III Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 and Ricoh GR III. The complete galleries are available at Olympus 6020 Gallery and Ricoh GR III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Ricoh GR III
6020 | GR III |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over the Olympus 6020
GR III | 6020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2018 | ![]() | February 2010 | More recent by 105 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+807k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus 6020 and Ricoh GR III
6020 | GR III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen |
Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GR III Physical Comparison
If you are planning to lug around your camera often, you will need to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus 6020 enjoys outside dimensions of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GR III has specifications of 109mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 257 grams (0.57 lbs).
Check out the Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GR III in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are using during that time. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the 6020 versus the GR III.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the 6020 and GR III is 95 and 90 respectively.

Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GR III Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to visualize the difference in sensor measurements simply by going through a spec sheet. The visual below will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the 6020 and GR III.
Clearly, both of the cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The 6020 featuring a smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF tougher and the Ricoh GR III will produce extra detail utilizing its extra 11 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The older 6020 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GR III Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GR III Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Ricoh GR III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Ricoh GR III |
Also called | mju Tough 6020 | - |
Category | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
Released | 2010-02-02 | 2018-09-25 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 13 megapixel | 24 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1 and 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 6000 x 4000 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 102400 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.8-16 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 6cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 230k dot | 1,037k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1/4 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 122 gr (0.27 pounds) | 257 gr (0.57 pounds) |
Dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | Li-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $279 | $900 |