Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
95 Imaging
35 Features
32 Overall
33


77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Released February 2010
- Alternate Name is mju Tough 6020
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Announced November 2009

Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview
Let's look more in depth at the Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the 6020 (13MP) and the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) is fairly close but the 6020 (1/2.3") and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) boast totally different sensor sizes.

The 6020 was introduced 3 months after the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and they are of a similar age. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus 6020 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going straight to a in depth comparison, here is a brief overview of how the 6020 matches up against the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 & Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro. The whole galleries are available at Olympus 6020 Gallery & Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
6020 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Olympus 6020
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | 6020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 6020 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
6020 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2010 | ![]() | November 2009 | Same age |
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry around your camera, you should consider its weight and volume. The Olympus 6020 has got external dimensions of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has sizing of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the 6020 and the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the 6020 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 95 and 77 respectively.

Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its difficult to envision the gap in sensor sizes merely by viewing specs. The image underneath will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the 6020 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The 6020 with its smaller sensor will make getting shallower depth of field harder and the Olympus 6020 will result in more detail using its extra 1MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics a good deal more aggressively.

Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro |
Also called as | mju Tough 6020 | - |
Class | Waterproof | Advanced Mirrorless |
Released | 2010-02-02 | 2009-11-10 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | GR engine III |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 13 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4288 x 2848 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 200 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 50mm (1x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.5 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1/4 seconds | 180 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/3200 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | 3.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 122g (0.27 pounds) | 453g (1.00 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 320 images |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail pricing | $279 | $566 |