Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
95 Imaging
35 Features
32 Overall
33


69 Imaging
56 Features
45 Overall
51
Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Announced February 2010
- Other Name is mju Tough 6020
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-85mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 550g - 114 x 75 x 93mm
- Introduced February 2012

Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Overview
Here is a in depth comparison of the Olympus 6020 and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the 6020 (13MP) and the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (16MP) is pretty comparable but the 6020 (1/2.3") and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (APS-C) feature totally different sensor sizing.

The 6020 was revealed 24 months before the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus 6020 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go in to a thorough comparison, below is a brief summary of how the 6020 scores vs the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus 6020 Gallery and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
6020 | GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 over the Olympus 6020
GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | 6020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2012 | ![]() | February 2010 | Fresher by 24 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 6020 and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
6020 | GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither offers Touch screen |
Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry your camera often, you have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus 6020 offers physical dimensions of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 has dimensions of 114mm x 75mm x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") and a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs).
Check out the Olympus 6020 and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are employing at that moment. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the 6020 versus the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the 6020 and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 is 95 and 69 respectively.

Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is tough to visualise the gap in sensor sizing purely by seeing specifications. The photograph below may offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the 6020 and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.
To sum up, both of these cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The 6020 using its smaller sensor will make shooting shallower DOF tougher and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 will produce more detail because of its extra 3MP. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures much more aggressively. The older 6020 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.

Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 |
Other name | mju Tough 6020 | - |
Category | Waterproof | Advanced Mirrorless |
Announced | 2010-02-02 | 2012-02-02 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 13 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4928 x 3264 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 200 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-85mm (3.5x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 230k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | - | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1/4 secs | 180 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/3200 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 122 gr (0.27 lbs) | 550 gr (1.21 lbs) |
Dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 114 x 75 x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 400 photographs |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-50B | DB-90 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail pricing | $279 | $871 |