Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34


90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Released February 2010
- Other Name is mju Tough 6020
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Introduced February 2014
- New Model is Ricoh WG-5 GPS

Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Olympus 6020 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS, both Waterproof cameras by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the 6020 (13MP) and the WG-4 GPS (16MP) is pretty comparable and both cameras offer the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").

The 6020 was announced 5 years prior to the WG-4 GPS and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a quick overview of how the 6020 matches up against the WG-4 GPS for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus 6020 Gallery and Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
6020 | WG-4 GPS |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Olympus 6020
WG-4 GPS | 6020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2014 | ![]() | February 2010 | Fresher by 48 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 6020 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
6020 | WG-4 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither features Touch screen |
Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry your camera often, you should think about its weight and volume. The Olympus 6020 enjoys physical measurements of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has sizing of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus 6020 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you choose at the time. Here is a front view size comparison of the 6020 against the WG-4 GPS.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the 6020 and WG-4 GPS is 95 and 90 respectively.

Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be difficult to see the gap in sensor sizing only by seeing technical specs. The graphic here should provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the 6020 and WG-4 GPS.
As you can tell, each of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You should expect the Ricoh WG-4 GPS to provide more detail with its extra 3MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots more aggressively. The older 6020 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS |
Alternate name | mju Tough 6020 | - |
Category | Waterproof | Waterproof |
Released | 2010-02-02 | 2014-02-05 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 13 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1/4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264 | H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 122 gr (0.27 lbs) | 235 gr (0.52 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 240 pictures |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-50B | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $279 | $210 |