Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh WG-50
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f83bd/f83bdf39352a979ef5fa8b296f80d35d80574119" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 front Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3ac2e/3ac2ec410ac86be34c3479c4117466c247b1411d" alt="Ricoh WG-50 front Ricoh WG-50 front"
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh WG-50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Announced February 2010
- Also referred to as mju Tough 6020
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Announced May 2017
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh WG-50 Overview
Below is a thorough review of the Olympus 6020 and Ricoh WG-50, both Waterproof digital cameras by companies Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the 6020 (13MP) and the WG-50 (16MP) is pretty similar and both cameras have the same sensor size (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The 6020 was announced 8 years before the WG-50 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a complete comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the 6020 scores vs the WG-50 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh WG-50 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 & Ricoh WG-50. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus 6020 Gallery & Ricoh WG-50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Ricoh WG-50
6020 | WG-50 |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Olympus 6020
WG-50 | 6020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | May 2017 | ![]() | February 2010 | More recent by 88 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | More precise focus |
Common features in the Olympus 6020 and Ricoh WG-50
6020 | WG-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimensions | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Equal screen size |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh WG-50 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to lug around your camera, you have to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus 6020 provides external measurements of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-50 has sizing of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus 6020 and Ricoh WG-50 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you use during that time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the 6020 and the WG-50.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/46368/46368cb6581816afec733b409b4907f79204d109" alt="Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh WG-50 size comparison Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh WG-50 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the 6020 and WG-50 is 95 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b0ec7/b0ec755f05c757edbcbfc01b08c0a0f8d85af928" alt="Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh WG-50 top view buttons comparison Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh WG-50 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh WG-50 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's hard to envision the gap between sensor measurements merely by reviewing specs. The visual below will help give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the 6020 and WG-50.
All in all, both of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Ricoh WG-50 to deliver extra detail with its extra 3MP. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The older 6020 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/159ed/159ed0dbd919af95112ba2d475333e56548771c4" alt="Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh WG-50 sensor size comparison Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh WG-50 sensor size comparison"
Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0c613/0c613c04b35ea21586a703bdeb134a99be7a7b24" alt="Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh WG-50 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Ricoh WG-50 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Ricoh WG-50 |
Also referred to as | mju Tough 6020 | - |
Type | Waterproof | Waterproof |
Announced | 2010-02-02 | 2017-05-24 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 13 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1/4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | On, off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Yes (Wireless) |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 122 gr (0.27 pounds) | 193 gr (0.43 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 shots |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-50B | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $279 | $280 |