Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh WG-50
95 Imaging
35 Features
32 Overall
33
91 Imaging
41 Features
39 Overall
40
Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh WG-50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Announced February 2010
- Also referred to as mju Tough 6020
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Announced May 2017
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh WG-50 Overview
Below is a thorough review of the Olympus 6020 and Ricoh WG-50, both Waterproof digital cameras by companies Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the 6020 (13MP) and the WG-50 (16MP) is pretty similar and both cameras have the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraThe 6020 was announced 8 years before the WG-50 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a complete comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the 6020 scores vs the WG-50 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh WG-50 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 & Ricoh WG-50. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus 6020 Gallery & Ricoh WG-50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Ricoh WG-50
| 6020 | WG-50 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Olympus 6020
| WG-50 | 6020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | May 2017 | February 2010 | More recent by 88 months | |
| Focus manually | More precise focus |
Common features in the Olympus 6020 and Ricoh WG-50
| 6020 | WG-50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 2.7" | 2.7" | Equal screen size | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Same screen resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh WG-50 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to lug around your camera, you have to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus 6020 provides external measurements of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-50 has sizing of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus 6020 and Ricoh WG-50 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you use during that time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the 6020 and the WG-50.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the 6020 and WG-50 is 95 and 91 respectively.
Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh WG-50 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's hard to envision the gap between sensor measurements merely by reviewing specs. The visual below will help give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the 6020 and WG-50.
All in all, both of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Ricoh WG-50 to deliver extra detail with its extra 3MP. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The older 6020 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh WG-50 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Ricoh WG-50 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Ricoh WG-50 |
| Also referred to as | mju Tough 6020 | - |
| Type | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2010-02-02 | 2017-05-24 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 13 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 1/4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | On, off |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Yes (Wireless) |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 122 gr (0.27 pounds) | 193 gr (0.43 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 shots |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | Li-50B | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $279 | $280 |