Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh WG-6
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f83bd/f83bdf39352a979ef5fa8b296f80d35d80574119" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 front Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/07dc5/07dc58b4a79864661a81726797271145ae172467" alt="Ricoh WG-6 front Ricoh WG-6 front"
89 Imaging
47 Features
46 Overall
46
Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh WG-6 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Released February 2010
- Alternate Name is mju Tough 6020
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 246g - 118 x 66 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2018
- Replaced the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh WG-6 Overview
Here, we are reviewing the Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh WG-6, both Waterproof digital cameras by brands Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a crucial gap between the resolutions of the 6020 (13MP) and WG-6 (20MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The 6020 was brought out 9 years prior to the WG-6 and that is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a detailed comparison, here is a short introduction of how the 6020 grades vs the WG-6 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh WG-6 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 and Ricoh WG-6. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus 6020 Gallery and Ricoh WG-6 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Ricoh WG-6
6020 | WG-6 |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-6 over the Olympus 6020
WG-6 | 6020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2018 | ![]() | February 2010 | Fresher by 98 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+810k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 6020 and Ricoh WG-6
6020 | WG-6 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither offers Touch display |
Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh WG-6 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry your camera regularly, you should think about its weight and size. The Olympus 6020 offers exterior measurements of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-6 has specifications of 118mm x 66mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 246 grams (0.54 lbs).
Check the Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh WG-6 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. The following is a front view size comparison of the 6020 versus the WG-6.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6bd47/6bd47d3fb3edc00f0fb7bacd68eab5cdfd597bbc" alt="Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh WG-6 size comparison Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh WG-6 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the 6020 and WG-6 is 95 and 89 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7882c/7882c6a6db4f93b713f24949cc11b95b6ffd481b" alt="Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh WG-6 top view buttons comparison Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh WG-6 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh WG-6 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is difficult to see the difference between sensor sizing just by reading technical specs. The visual here should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the 6020 and WG-6.
As you can tell, both of these cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same megapixels. You should expect to see the Ricoh WG-6 to offer you more detail having its extra 7MP. Greater resolution will let you crop images way more aggressively. The older 6020 is going to be behind in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c2a65/c2a65ee1dccb8ce2e60d5037709e41d98d0d8a86" alt="Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh WG-6 sensor size comparison Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh WG-6 sensor size comparison"
Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh WG-6 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/61a94/61a94176bed94217efd5a37f438be0dba34bf523" alt="Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh WG-6 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh WG-6 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh WG-6 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Ricoh WG-6 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Ricoh WG-6 |
Also Known as | mju Tough 6020 | - |
Class | Waterproof | Waterproof |
Released | 2010-02-02 | 2018-02-21 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 13 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5184 x 3888 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 1,040 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1/4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | 5.50 m (with Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Flash on, flash off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 3840x2160 |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Supports FlashAir SD cards |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | DB-110 lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
GPS | None | Built-in |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 122 grams (0.27 lb) | 246 grams (0.54 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 118 x 66 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 340 photos |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $279 | $271 |