Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh WG-80
95 Imaging
35 Features
32 Overall
33
91 Imaging
44 Features
35 Overall
40
Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh WG-80 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Revealed February 2010
- Alternative Name is mju Tough 6020
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.70" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Launched May 2022
- Replaced the Ricoh WG-70
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh WG-80 Overview
Following is a in depth analysis of the Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh WG-80, both Waterproof cameras by companies Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the 6020 (13MP) and the WG-80 (16MP) is fairly comparable and they enjoy the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe 6020 was introduced 13 years earlier than the WG-80 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a short summary of how the 6020 scores against the WG-80 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh WG-80 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 & Ricoh WG-80. The whole galleries are available at Olympus 6020 Gallery & Ricoh WG-80 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Ricoh WG-80
| 6020 | WG-80 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-80 over the Olympus 6020
| WG-80 | 6020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | May 2022 |  | February 2010 | More modern by 149 months |
| Manually focus |  | More precise focus |
Common features in the Olympus 6020 and Ricoh WG-80
| 6020 | WG-80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 2.7" |  | 2.70" | Identical display size |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | No Touch display |
Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh WG-80 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry around your camera often, you need to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus 6020 offers exterior measurements of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-80 has measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check the Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh WG-80 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you use at the time. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the 6020 versus the WG-80.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the 6020 and WG-80 is 95 and 91 respectively.
Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh WG-80 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its hard to visualise the gap in sensor sizes simply by checking out technical specs. The picture here will give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the 6020 and WG-80.
As you can tell, both of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Ricoh WG-80 to provide more detail using its extra 3 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The more aged 6020 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh WG-80 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh WG-80 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Ricoh WG-80 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Ricoh WG-80 |
| Also Known as | mju Tough 6020 | - |
| Class | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2010-02-02 | 2022-05-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 13MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7" | 2.70" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 1/4 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | On, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 122 gr (0.27 lb) | 193 gr (0.43 lb) |
| Dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 images |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | Li-50B | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $279 | $300 |