Olympus 6020 vs Samsung CL80
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
95 Imaging
37 Features
30 Overall
34
Olympus 6020 vs Samsung CL80 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Revealed February 2010
- Additionally referred to as mju Tough 6020
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Expand to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Released January 2010
- Alternate Name is ST5500
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus 6020 vs Samsung CL80 Overview
Below is a detailed analysis of the Olympus 6020 vs Samsung CL80, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the 6020 (13MP) and the CL80 (14MP) is very similar and they feature the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe 6020 was brought out around the same time to the CL80 and they are both of a similar age. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus 6020 being a Compact camera and the Samsung CL80 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief summary of how the 6020 matches up vs the CL80 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus 6020 vs Samsung CL80 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 & Samsung CL80. The entire galleries are available at Olympus 6020 Gallery & Samsung CL80 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Samsung CL80
| 6020 | CL80 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung CL80 over the Olympus 6020
| CL80 | 6020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 3.7" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+1") |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus 6020 and Samsung CL80
| 6020 | CL80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2010 |  | January 2010 | Similar age |
| Manually focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Exact same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen |
Olympus 6020 vs Samsung CL80 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you'll have to think about its weight and size. The Olympus 6020 provides exterior measurements of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs) while the Samsung CL80 has specifications of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus 6020 vs Samsung CL80 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are working with during that time. The following is the front view measurement comparison of the 6020 against the CL80.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the 6020 and CL80 is 95 and 95 respectively.
Olympus 6020 vs Samsung CL80 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very tough to picture the contrast between sensor measurements simply by going over specs. The visual underneath may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the 6020 and CL80.
All in all, the two cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different resolution. You can expect to see the Samsung CL80 to offer you greater detail having its extra 1MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos much more aggressively.
Olympus 6020 vs Samsung CL80 Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus 6020 vs Samsung CL80 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Samsung CL80 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Samsung CL80 |
| Also called as | mju Tough 6020 | ST5500 |
| Class | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2010-02-02 | 2010-01-06 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 13 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4334 x 3256 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 4800 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.3-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 3.7" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 1/4s | 8s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 5.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 122g (0.27 pounds) | 160g (0.35 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | Li-50B | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $279 | $400 |