Olympus 6020 vs Samsung GX-1S
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
68 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
Olympus 6020 vs Samsung GX-1S Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Launched February 2010
- Alternate Name is mju Tough 6020
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- No Video
- Pentax KAF Mount
- 605g - 125 x 93 x 66mm
- Released January 2006
Olympus 6020 vs Samsung GX-1S Overview
Following is a extensive review of the Olympus 6020 and Samsung GX-1S, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by rivals Olympus and Samsung. There is a large difference between the image resolutions of the 6020 (13MP) and GX-1S (6MP) and the 6020 (1/2.3") and GX-1S (APS-C) offer different sensor measurements.
Photography GlossaryThe 6020 was unveiled 4 years after the GX-1S which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus 6020 being a Compact camera and the Samsung GX-1S being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before diving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the 6020 matches up versus the GX-1S in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus 6020 vs Samsung GX-1S Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 & Samsung GX-1S. The full galleries are provided at Olympus 6020 Gallery & Samsung GX-1S Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Samsung GX-1S
6020 | GX-1S | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2010 | January 2006 | More modern by 50 months | |
Screen size | 2.7" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 210k | Clearer screen (+20k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-1S over the Olympus 6020
GX-1S | 6020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More accurate focus |
Common features in the Olympus 6020 and Samsung GX-1S
6020 | GX-1S | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither offers Touch screen |
Olympus 6020 vs Samsung GX-1S Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry around your camera frequently, you will need to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus 6020 offers physical dimensions of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Samsung GX-1S has specifications of 125mm x 93mm x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") and a weight of 605 grams (1.33 lbs).
Check out the Olympus 6020 and Samsung GX-1S in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have attached at that time. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the 6020 versus the GX-1S.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the 6020 and GX-1S is 95 and 68 respectively.
Olympus 6020 vs Samsung GX-1S Sensor Comparison
Generally, its hard to visualize the difference between sensor sizes purely by going over technical specs. The pic here may provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the 6020 and GX-1S.
As you have seen, each of the cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The 6020 using its tinier sensor is going to make achieving bokeh tougher and the Olympus 6020 will offer greater detail having an extra 7MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The younger 6020 should have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus 6020 vs Samsung GX-1S Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 6020 vs Samsung GX-1S Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Samsung GX-1S | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Samsung GX-1S |
Other name | mju Tough 6020 | - |
Category | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
Launched | 2010-02-02 | 2006-01-16 |
Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 13 megapixels | 6 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3008 x 2008 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 200 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Pentax KAF |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 151 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 2.5 inches |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 210 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1/4 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video format | H.264 | - |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 122 grams (0.27 lbs) | 605 grams (1.33 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 125 x 93 x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | Li-50B | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/MMC card |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $279 | $850 |