Olympus 6020 vs Samsung SH100
95 Imaging
35 Features
32 Overall
33
99 Imaging
36 Features
25 Overall
31
Olympus 6020 vs Samsung SH100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Launched February 2010
- Additionally referred to as mju Tough 6020
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 93 x 54 x 19mm
- Revealed January 2011
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus 6020 vs Samsung SH100 Overview
In this write-up, we are evaluating the Olympus 6020 vs Samsung SH100, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Ultracompact by brands Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the 6020 (13MP) and the SH100 (14MP) is fairly well matched and they come with the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe 6020 was brought out 11 months earlier than the SH100 so they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus 6020 being a Compact camera and the Samsung SH100 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting in to a thorough comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the 6020 matches up versus the SH100 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus 6020 vs Samsung SH100 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 & Samsung SH100. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus 6020 Gallery & Samsung SH100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Samsung SH100
| 6020 | SH100 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung SH100 over the Olympus 6020
| SH100 | 6020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2011 | February 2010 | More recent by 11 months | |
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus 6020 and Samsung SH100
| 6020 | SH100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Lack of manual focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Identical display resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen |
Olympus 6020 vs Samsung SH100 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to lug around your camera frequently, you have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus 6020 provides outer measurements of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Samsung SH100 has dimensions of 93mm x 54mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus 6020 vs Samsung SH100 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you use during that time. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the 6020 and the SH100.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the 6020 and SH100 is 95 and 99 respectively.
Olympus 6020 vs Samsung SH100 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor measurements just by checking a spec sheet. The photograph here might provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the 6020 and SH100.
As you can see, both cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different resolution. You can anticipate the Samsung SH100 to resolve extra detail having its extra 1 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images far more aggressively. The older 6020 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Olympus 6020 vs Samsung SH100 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus 6020 vs Samsung SH100 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Samsung SH100 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Samsung SH100 |
| Also Known as | mju Tough 6020 | - |
| Class | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2010-02-02 | 2011-01-04 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 13 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4230 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | - |
| Min native ISO | 64 | - |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | () |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | - |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1/4s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 5.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 122g (0.27 lbs) | - |
| Dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 93 x 54 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | Li-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | - |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $279 | $200 |