Olympus 6020 vs Samsung SL102
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Olympus 6020 vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Announced February 2010
- Additionally referred to as mju Tough 6020
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Launched January 2009
- Additionally Known as ES55
Olympus 6020 vs Samsung SL102 Overview
Here is a in-depth review of the Olympus 6020 vs Samsung SL102, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Samsung. There exists a noticeable gap between the resolutions of the 6020 (13MP) and SL102 (10MP) but they possess the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe 6020 was launched 13 months later than the SL102 making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a in-depth comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the 6020 scores vs the SL102 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus 6020 vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 & Samsung SL102. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus 6020 Gallery & Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Samsung SL102
6020 | SL102 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2010 | January 2009 | Fresher by 13 months | |
Display dimension | 2.7" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Olympus 6020
SL102 | 6020 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus 6020 and Samsung SL102
6020 | SL102 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | No manual focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Identical display resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Olympus 6020 vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry your camera often, you're going to have to factor its weight and size. The Olympus 6020 has outer measurements of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL102 has specifications of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Check the Olympus 6020 vs Samsung SL102 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you select at the time. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the 6020 and the SL102.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the 6020 and SL102 is 95 and 96 respectively.
Olympus 6020 vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its difficult to envision the gap between sensor sizing simply by looking at a spec sheet. The graphic here will offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the 6020 and SL102.
As you can see, both of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Olympus 6020 to give greater detail utilizing its extra 3MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The fresher 6020 is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus 6020 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 6020 vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Samsung SL102 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Samsung SL102 |
Also called as | mju Tough 6020 | ES55 |
Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2010-02-02 | 2009-01-08 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 13MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 10cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inch | 2.5 inch |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1/4s | 8s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 122 gr (0.27 lb) | 116 gr (0.26 lb) |
Dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | Li-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $279 | $130 |