Clicky

Olympus 6020 vs Samsung SL102

Portability
95
Imaging
36
Features
32
Overall
34
Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 front
 
Samsung SL102 front
Portability
96
Imaging
33
Features
21
Overall
28

Olympus 6020 vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs

Olympus 6020
(Full Review)
  • 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
  • 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
  • Announced February 2010
  • Additionally referred to as mju Tough 6020
Samsung SL102
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-105mm (F) lens
  • 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
  • Launched January 2009
  • Additionally Known as ES55
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus 6020 vs Samsung SL102 Overview

Here is a in-depth review of the Olympus 6020 vs Samsung SL102, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Samsung. There exists a noticeable gap between the resolutions of the 6020 (13MP) and SL102 (10MP) but they possess the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

The 6020 was launched 13 months later than the SL102 making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before getting in to a in-depth comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the 6020 scores vs the SL102 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Samsung SL102

 6020 SL102 
LaunchedFebruary 2010January 2009Fresher by 13 months
Display dimension2.7"2.5"Larger display (+0.2")

Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Olympus 6020

 SL102 6020 

Common features in the Olympus 6020 and Samsung SL102

 6020 SL102 
Manual focus No manual focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display resolution230k230kIdentical display resolution
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither has Touch friendly display

Olympus 6020 vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison

If you're planning to carry your camera often, you're going to have to factor its weight and size. The Olympus 6020 has outer measurements of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL102 has specifications of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).

Check the Olympus 6020 vs Samsung SL102 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you select at the time. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the 6020 and the SL102.

Olympus 6020 vs Samsung SL102 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the 6020 and SL102 is 95 and 96 respectively.

Olympus 6020 vs Samsung SL102 top view buttons comparison

Olympus 6020 vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, its difficult to envision the gap between sensor sizing simply by looking at a spec sheet. The graphic here will offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the 6020 and SL102.

As you can see, both of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Olympus 6020 to give greater detail utilizing its extra 3MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The fresher 6020 is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus 6020 vs Samsung SL102 sensor size comparison

Olympus 6020 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus 6020 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus 6020 Portrait photography features
Samsung SL102 Portrait photography features
28
decent sensor resolution (13MP)
manual focus not available
lack of manual mode
external flash not possible
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
25
offers face detection autofocus
manual focus not available
lack of manual exposure
can't use external flash
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Olympus 6020 Street photography factors
Samsung SL102 Street photography factors
66
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment sealing
lighter than others in class (122g)
screen is fixed
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
55
lighter than others in class (116 grams)
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Olympus 6020 as a Sports photography camera
Samsung SL102 as a Sports photography camera
43
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (13MP)
provides tracking focus
environment sealing
slow continuous shooting (5.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
16
no shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Olympus 6020 Travel photography details
Samsung SL102 Travel photography details
70
lighter than others in class (122g)
environment sealing
decent sensor resolution (13 megapixels)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
does not have Timelapse function
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
62
lighter than others in class (116 grams)
has built in flash
great max aperture (f)
missing Timelapse function
low megapixels (10MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not good (35mm)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Olympus 6020 Landscape photography factors
Samsung SL102 Landscape photography factors
40
reasonably wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (13 megapixels)
environment sealing
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
screen is small (2.7")
lack of manual mode
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
does not have Timelapse function
27
great max aperture (f)
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (35mm)
small screen (2.5 inch)
lack of manual exposure
does not have image stabilization
low megapixels (10MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
missing Timelapse function
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus 6020 Vlogging highlights
Samsung SL102 Vlogging highlights
31
reasonably wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others in class (122 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
screen is not selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have microphone socket
30
great max aperture (f)
offers face detection autofocus
lighter than others in class (116g)
wide angle not good (35mm)
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
video resolution low (640 x 480 resolution)
missing external microphone support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus 6020 vs Samsung SL102 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus 6020 and Samsung SL102
 Olympus Stylus Tough 6020Samsung SL102
General Information
Make Olympus Samsung
Model Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 Samsung SL102
Also called as mju Tough 6020 ES55
Type Waterproof Small Sensor Compact
Announced 2010-02-02 2009-01-08
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic III -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.08 x 4.56mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 27.7mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 13MP 10MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 4288 x 3216 3648 x 2736
Max native ISO 1600 1600
Minimum native ISO 64 80
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-140mm (5.0x) 35-105mm (3.0x)
Maximal aperture f/3.9-5.9 -
Macro focus distance 1cm 10cm
Crop factor 5.9 5.9
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.7 inch 2.5 inch
Screen resolution 230 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 1/4s 8s
Highest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/1500s
Continuous shooting rate 5.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 4.00 m -
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video file format H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 122 gr (0.27 lb) 116 gr (0.26 lb)
Dimensions 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model Li-50B -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 seconds) Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer)
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD/SDHC, Internal SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal
Card slots 1 1
Price at launch $279 $130