Olympus 6020 vs Samsung WB210
95 Imaging
35 Features
32 Overall
33
94 Imaging
37 Features
45 Overall
40
Olympus 6020 vs Samsung WB210 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Launched February 2010
- Alternative Name is mju Tough 6020
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Increase to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
- 174g - 101 x 59 x 22mm
- Launched July 2011
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus 6020 vs Samsung WB210 Overview
In this article, we are contrasting the Olympus 6020 and Samsung WB210, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the 6020 (13MP) and the WB210 (14MP) is very close and they enjoy the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe 6020 was brought out 17 months earlier than the WB210 making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief summary of how the 6020 grades versus the WB210 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus 6020 vs Samsung WB210 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 & Samsung WB210. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus 6020 Gallery & Samsung WB210 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Samsung WB210
| 6020 | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 1k | Clearer display (+229k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB210 over the Olympus 6020
| WB210 | 6020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | July 2011 |  | February 2010 | More recent by 17 months |
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Display sizing | 3.5" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.8") |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus 6020 and Samsung WB210
| 6020 | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus 6020 vs Samsung WB210 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to lug around your camera regularly, you will want to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus 6020 offers outside dimensions of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs) while the Samsung WB210 has dimensions of 101mm x 59mm x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 174 grams (0.38 lbs).
Check out the Olympus 6020 and Samsung WB210 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you use during that time. The following is the front view measurement comparison of the 6020 versus the WB210.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the 6020 and WB210 is 95 and 94 respectively.
Olympus 6020 vs Samsung WB210 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be tough to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements purely by researching specifications. The visual underneath might offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the 6020 and WB210.
Plainly, both the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different megapixels. You can expect to see the Samsung WB210 to result in extra detail having its extra 1MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos a little more aggressively. The older 6020 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus 6020 vs Samsung WB210 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus 6020 vs Samsung WB210 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Samsung WB210 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Samsung WB210 |
| Otherwise known as | mju Tough 6020 | - |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2010-02-02 | 2011-07-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 13MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 3.5 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 1k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1/4 secs | 8 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 5.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 122 grams (0.27 lb) | 174 grams (0.38 lb) |
| Dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 101 x 59 x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | Li-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | microSC/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $279 | $279 |