Olympus 6020 vs Samsung WB250F
95 Imaging
35 Features
32 Overall
33
93 Imaging
37 Features
44 Overall
39
Olympus 6020 vs Samsung WB250F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Released February 2010
- Additionally referred to as mju Tough 6020
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 226g - 106 x 62 x 22mm
- Announced January 2013
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus 6020 vs Samsung WB250F Overview
Here is a comprehensive analysis of the Olympus 6020 versus Samsung WB250F, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the 6020 (13MP) and the WB250F (14MP) is very well matched and they use the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe 6020 was manufactured 3 years earlier than the WB250F and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a complete comparison, below is a quick overview of how the 6020 grades versus the WB250F in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Olympus 6020 vs Samsung WB250F Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 and Samsung WB250F. The entire galleries are available at Olympus 6020 Gallery and Samsung WB250F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Samsung WB250F
| 6020 | WB250F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB250F over the Olympus 6020
| WB250F | 6020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2013 | February 2010 | Fresher by 35 months | |
| Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) | |
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus 6020 and Samsung WB250F
| 6020 | WB250F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Lack of manual focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen |
Olympus 6020 vs Samsung WB250F Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry your camera regularly, you'll need to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus 6020 enjoys physical dimensions of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Samsung WB250F has sizing of 106mm x 62mm x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
Check out the Olympus 6020 versus Samsung WB250F in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the 6020 compared to the WB250F.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the 6020 and WB250F is 95 and 93 respectively.
Olympus 6020 vs Samsung WB250F Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is hard to visualize the contrast between sensor sizing simply by looking at a spec sheet. The photograph below will give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the 6020 and WB250F.
Clearly, both of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You should expect to see the Samsung WB250F to give you extra detail due to its extra 1 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics much more aggressively. The older 6020 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus 6020 vs Samsung WB250F Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus 6020 vs Samsung WB250F Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Samsung WB250F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Samsung WB250F |
| Also referred to as | mju Tough 6020 | - |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2010-02-02 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 13 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 1/4 secs | 16 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 5.0fps | 8.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 122 grams (0.27 pounds) | 226 grams (0.50 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 106 x 62 x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | Li-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $279 | $250 |