Clicky

Olympus 6020 vs Samsung WB50F

Portability
95
Imaging
36
Features
32
Overall
34
Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 front
 
Samsung WB50F front
Portability
92
Imaging
40
Features
36
Overall
38

Olympus 6020 vs Samsung WB50F Key Specs

Olympus 6020
(Full Review)
  • 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
  • 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
  • Revealed February 2010
  • Additionally Known as mju Tough 6020
Samsung WB50F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
  • 207g - 101 x 68 x 27mm
  • Launched January 2014
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus 6020 vs Samsung WB50F Overview

Here is a thorough analysis of the Olympus 6020 versus Samsung WB50F, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the 6020 (13MP) and the WB50F (16MP) is pretty similar and both cameras offer the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Photography Glossary

The 6020 was released 4 years before the WB50F and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before diving right into a detailed comparison, here is a brief overview of how the 6020 grades against the WB50F with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Samsung WB50F

 6020 WB50F 

Reasons to pick Samsung WB50F over the Olympus 6020

 WB50F 6020 
LaunchedJanuary 2014February 2010Fresher by 47 months
Manual focus More precise focusing
Screen size3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution460k230kClearer screen (+230k dot)

Common features in the Olympus 6020 and Samsung WB50F

 6020 WB50F 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch screen Neither provides Touch screen

Olympus 6020 vs Samsung WB50F Physical Comparison

In case you're intending to carry your camera often, you'll have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus 6020 provides physical measurements of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Samsung WB50F has dimensions of 101mm x 68mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 207 grams (0.46 lbs).

Check out the Olympus 6020 versus Samsung WB50F in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are employing during that time. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the 6020 against the WB50F.

Olympus 6020 vs Samsung WB50F size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the 6020 and WB50F is 95 and 92 respectively.

Olympus 6020 vs Samsung WB50F top view buttons comparison

Olympus 6020 vs Samsung WB50F Sensor Comparison

Quite often, its tough to see the gap between sensor sizing just by reading technical specs. The visual here will give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the 6020 and WB50F.

As you can tell, each of the cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same resolution. You should expect the Samsung WB50F to offer you greater detail as a result of its extra 3MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The older 6020 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus 6020 vs Samsung WB50F sensor size comparison

Olympus 6020 vs Samsung WB50F Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus 6020 vs Samsung WB50F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus 6020 as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung WB50F as a Portrait photography camera
28
good resolution (13MP)
lack of manual focus
lack of manual exposure
no external flash support
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW format
37
focusing manually
MP count good (16MP)
no manual mode
no external flash support
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Olympus 6020 Street photography information
Samsung WB50F Street photography information
66
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment sealing
lighter than others in class (122g)
no articulating screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW format
62
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others (207g)
screen does not articulate
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus 6020
Sports photography with Samsung WB50F
43
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (13 megapixels)
has tracking focus
environment sealing
continuous shooting slow (5.0 fps)
no shutter priority
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
40
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count good (16 megapixels)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Olympus 6020 Travel photography information
Samsung WB50F Travel photography information
70
lighter than others in class (122g)
environment sealing
good resolution (13 megapixels)
has built in flash
relatively wide (28mm)
no Timelapse recording
does not have a selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
69
lighter than others (207 grams)
MP count good (16MP)
built-in flash
relatively wide (24mm)
long reach (288mm)
does not have Time Lapse function
does not posses selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus 6020
Landscape photography with Samsung WB50F
40
relatively wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (13MP)
environment sealing
lack of manual focus
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
small screen (2.7")
lack of manual exposure
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW format
no Timelapse recording
47
focusing manually
relatively wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count good (16MP)
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
no manual mode
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
does not have Time Lapse function
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus 6020 Vlogging factors
Samsung WB50F Vlogging factors
31
relatively wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others in class (122 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
does not have a selfie friendly display
low res video (1280 x 720 pxls)
no microphone support
30
relatively wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others (207 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
does not posses selfie friendly display
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have external mic socket
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Olympus 6020 vs Samsung WB50F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus 6020 and Samsung WB50F
 Olympus Stylus Tough 6020Samsung WB50F
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Samsung
Model type Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 Samsung WB50F
Also Known as mju Tough 6020 -
Class Waterproof Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2010-02-02 2014-01-07
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic III -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.08 x 4.56mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 27.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 13 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4288 x 3216 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 64 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-140mm (5.0x) 24-288mm (12.0x)
Maximal aperture f/3.9-5.9 f/3.1-6.3
Macro focusing range 1cm -
Crop factor 5.9 5.8
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 2.7" 3"
Display resolution 230k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Min shutter speed 1/4 seconds -
Max shutter speed 1/2000 seconds -
Continuous shutter rate 5.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 4.00 m -
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in -
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 1280 x 720
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video file format H.264 -
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 122g (0.27 lb) 207g (0.46 lb)
Physical dimensions 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") 101 x 68 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID Li-50B BP70A
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 seconds) -
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD/SDHC, Internal MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC
Card slots One One
Cost at release $279 $180