Olympus 6020 vs Samsung WB800F
95 Imaging
35 Features
32 Overall
33
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Olympus 6020 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Announced February 2010
- Also Known as mju Tough 6020
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2013
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus 6020 vs Samsung WB800F Overview
Below is a extensive comparison of the Olympus 6020 and Samsung WB800F, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the 6020 (13MP) and the WB800F (16MP) is very comparable and they use the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe 6020 was released 3 years before the WB800F and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the 6020 grades versus the WB800F when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus 6020 vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 & Samsung WB800F. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus 6020 Gallery & Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Samsung WB800F
| 6020 | WB800F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Olympus 6020
| WB800F | 6020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2013 |  | February 2010 | More recent by 35 months |
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus 6020 and Samsung WB800F
| 6020 | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus 6020 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus 6020 features outside measurements of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB800F has proportions of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Check the Olympus 6020 and Samsung WB800F in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have at that moment. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the 6020 compared to the WB800F.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the 6020 and WB800F is 95 and 92 respectively.
Olympus 6020 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very difficult to picture the gap in sensor measurements purely by seeing a spec sheet. The photograph below may give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the 6020 and WB800F.
As you can see, both the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You can expect to see the Samsung WB800F to produce extra detail as a result of its extra 3 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The older 6020 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Olympus 6020 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus 6020 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Samsung WB800F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Samsung WB800F |
| Also Known as | mju Tough 6020 | - |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2010-02-02 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 13 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 1/4 secs | 16 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 122g (0.27 lb) | 218g (0.48 lb) |
| Dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | Li-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $279 | $300 |