Olympus 6020 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro
95 Imaging
35 Features
32 Overall
33
70 Imaging
62 Features
38 Overall
52
Olympus 6020 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Revealed February 2010
- Other Name is mju Tough 6020
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- No Video
- 45mm (F2.8) lens
- 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
- Introduced February 2014
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus 6020 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview
On this page, we will be evaluating the Olympus 6020 versus Sigma DP2 Quattro, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Sigma. There exists a large gap between the resolutions of the 6020 (13MP) and DP2 Quattro (20MP) and the 6020 (1/2.3") and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) have different sensor dimensions.
Photography GlossaryThe 6020 was announced 5 years prior to the DP2 Quattro which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus 6020 being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before going straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the 6020 grades against the DP2 Quattro in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus 6020 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 & Sigma DP2 Quattro. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus 6020 Gallery & Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Sigma DP2 Quattro
| 6020 | DP2 Quattro |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Olympus 6020
| DP2 Quattro | 6020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2014 | February 2010 | Newer by 49 months | |
| Focus manually | Dial accurate focus | |||
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 6020 and Sigma DP2 Quattro
| 6020 | DP2 Quattro | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Olympus 6020 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to travel with your camera often, you'll have to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus 6020 features external dimensions of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs) while the Sigma DP2 Quattro has specifications of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") with a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).
Check the Olympus 6020 versus Sigma DP2 Quattro in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have chosen during that time. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the 6020 and the DP2 Quattro.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the 6020 and DP2 Quattro is 95 and 70 respectively.
Olympus 6020 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be tough to imagine the difference between sensor dimensions simply by reading specs. The image underneath will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the 6020 and DP2 Quattro.
All in all, the 2 cameras have different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The 6020 with its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF more challenging and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will offer more detail with its extra 7 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more aged 6020 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus 6020 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus 6020 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Sigma DP2 Quattro | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Sigma |
| Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Sigma DP2 Quattro |
| Alternative name | mju Tough 6020 | - |
| Category | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2010-02-02 | 2014-02-13 |
| Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III | TRUE III engine |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 13 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5424 x 3616 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 45mm (1x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 1/4 secs | 30 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0fps | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
| Video file format | H.264 | - |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 122 grams (0.27 lb) | 395 grams (0.87 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | Li-50B | BP-51 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | - |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $279 | $931 |