Clicky

Olympus 6020 vs Sigma Quattro

Portability
95
Imaging
36
Features
32
Overall
34
Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 front
 
Sigma sd Quattro front
Portability
63
Imaging
69
Features
56
Overall
63

Olympus 6020 vs Sigma Quattro Key Specs

Olympus 6020
(Full Review)
  • 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
  • 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
  • Released February 2010
  • Also Known as mju Tough 6020
Sigma Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 29MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
  • Released February 2016
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus 6020 vs Sigma Quattro Overview

Here, we will be contrasting the Olympus 6020 vs Sigma Quattro, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Sigma. There exists a huge gap among the resolutions of the 6020 (13MP) and Quattro (29MP) and the 6020 (1/2.3") and Quattro (APS-C) have different sensor size.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The 6020 was launched 7 years prior to the Quattro which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus 6020 being a Compact camera and the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before getting right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the 6020 scores versus the Quattro in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Sigma Quattro

 6020 Quattro 

Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Olympus 6020

 Quattro 6020 
ReleasedFebruary 2016February 2010Newer by 73 months
Focus manually More accurate focusing
Screen size3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution1620k230kSharper screen (+1390k dot)

Common features in the Olympus 6020 and Sigma Quattro

 6020 Quattro 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither features Touch friendly screen

Olympus 6020 vs Sigma Quattro Physical Comparison

For those who are going to travel with your camera often, you will have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus 6020 enjoys external measurements of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Sigma Quattro has proportions of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") with a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs).

Examine the Olympus 6020 vs Sigma Quattro in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you use at that time. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the 6020 against the Quattro.

Olympus 6020 vs Sigma Quattro size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the 6020 and Quattro is 95 and 63 respectively.

Olympus 6020 vs Sigma Quattro top view buttons comparison

Olympus 6020 vs Sigma Quattro Sensor Comparison

Typically, it's hard to imagine the gap in sensor dimensions just by viewing specs. The image underneath might give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the 6020 and Quattro.

All in all, both cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The 6020 because of its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF harder and the Sigma Quattro will result in extra detail utilizing its extra 16MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The more aged 6020 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus 6020 vs Sigma Quattro sensor size comparison

Olympus 6020 vs Sigma Quattro Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus 6020 vs Sigma Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus 6020 Portrait photography info
Sigma Quattro Portrait photography info
28
decent megapixels (13MP)
lack of manual focus
lack of manual exposure
can't use external flash
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
81
you can focus manually
great MP (29MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
offers face detection focusing
exports RAW formats
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Olympus 6020 Street photography info
Sigma Quattro Street photography info
66
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proofing
lighter than competitors (122g)
fixed screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
59
decent sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
environment proofing
screen does not articulate
no image stabilization
more heavy than average (625g)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Olympus 6020 Sports photography info
Sigma Quattro Sports photography info
43
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (13MP)
supports tracking autofocus
weather proofing
max fps low (5.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority mode
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
70
great MP (29MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
offers tracking autofocus
environment proofing
sensor has phase detect AF
max frames per second low (3.8 frames/s)
no image stabilization
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Olympus 6020 Travel photography info
Sigma Quattro Travel photography info
70
lighter than competitors (122g)
weather proofing
decent megapixels (13 megapixels)
has built in flash
really wide (28mm)
does not have Timelapse recording
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
55
environment proofing
great MP (29MP)
lack of Timelapse function
more heavy than average (625g)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus 6020
Landscape photography with Sigma Quattro
40
really wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (13MP)
weather proofing
lack of manual focus
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
small screen (2.7 inches)
lack of manual exposure
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
does not have Timelapse recording
72
you can focus manually
swap lenses (Sigma SA mount)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
great MP (29MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
environment proofing
no image stabilization
lack of Timelapse function
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus 6020
Vlogging with Sigma Quattro
31
really wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors (122g)
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have external microphone support
22
offers face detection focusing
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
low res video ( pxls)
lack of external microphone port
more heavy than average (625 grams)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus 6020 vs Sigma Quattro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus 6020 and Sigma Quattro
 Olympus Stylus Tough 6020Sigma sd Quattro
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Sigma
Model type Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 Sigma sd Quattro
Also referred to as mju Tough 6020 -
Class Waterproof Advanced Mirrorless
Released 2010-02-02 2016-02-23
Body design Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic III Dual TRUE III
Sensor type CCD CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.08 x 4.56mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor surface area 27.7mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 13MP 29MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4288 x 3216 5424 x 3616
Highest native ISO 1600 6400
Lowest native ISO 64 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points - 9
Lens
Lens support fixed lens Sigma SA
Lens zoom range 28-140mm (5.0x) -
Max aperture f/3.9-5.9 -
Macro focusing range 1cm -
Number of lenses - 76
Focal length multiplier 5.9 1.5
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.7" 3"
Screen resolution 230k dot 1,620k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,360k dot
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.73x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 1/4 secs 30 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 5.0fps 3.8fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 4.00 m no built-in flash
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in no built-in flash
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) -
Highest video resolution 1280x720 -
Video data format H.264 -
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 122 gr (0.27 lbs) 625 gr (1.38 lbs)
Physical dimensions 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID Li-50B BP-61
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 seconds) Yes
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots 1 1
Launch pricing $279 $738