Olympus 6020 vs Sigma Quattro
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
63 Imaging
69 Features
56 Overall
63
Olympus 6020 vs Sigma Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Released February 2010
- Also Known as mju Tough 6020
(Full Review)
- 29MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Released February 2016
Olympus 6020 vs Sigma Quattro Overview
Here, we will be contrasting the Olympus 6020 vs Sigma Quattro, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Sigma. There exists a huge gap among the resolutions of the 6020 (13MP) and Quattro (29MP) and the 6020 (1/2.3") and Quattro (APS-C) have different sensor size.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe 6020 was launched 7 years prior to the Quattro which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus 6020 being a Compact camera and the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the 6020 scores versus the Quattro in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus 6020 vs Sigma Quattro Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 and Sigma sd Quattro. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus 6020 Gallery and Sigma Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Sigma Quattro
6020 | Quattro |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Olympus 6020
Quattro | 6020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2016 | February 2010 | Newer by 73 months | |
Focus manually | More accurate focusing | |||
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 1620k | 230k | Sharper screen (+1390k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 6020 and Sigma Quattro
6020 | Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Olympus 6020 vs Sigma Quattro Physical Comparison
For those who are going to travel with your camera often, you will have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus 6020 enjoys external measurements of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Sigma Quattro has proportions of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") with a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs).
Examine the Olympus 6020 vs Sigma Quattro in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you use at that time. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the 6020 against the Quattro.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the 6020 and Quattro is 95 and 63 respectively.
Olympus 6020 vs Sigma Quattro Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's hard to imagine the gap in sensor dimensions just by viewing specs. The image underneath might give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the 6020 and Quattro.
All in all, both cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The 6020 because of its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF harder and the Sigma Quattro will result in extra detail utilizing its extra 16MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The more aged 6020 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus 6020 vs Sigma Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 6020 vs Sigma Quattro Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Sigma sd Quattro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sigma |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Sigma sd Quattro |
Also referred to as | mju Tough 6020 | - |
Class | Waterproof | Advanced Mirrorless |
Released | 2010-02-02 | 2016-02-23 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | Dual TRUE III |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 13MP | 29MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5424 x 3616 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 76 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 1,620k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1/4 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0fps | 3.8fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | - |
Video data format | H.264 | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 122 gr (0.27 lbs) | 625 gr (1.38 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | Li-50B | BP-61 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $279 | $738 |