Olympus 6020 vs Sony A350
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
62 Imaging
53 Features
47 Overall
50
Olympus 6020 vs Sony A350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Revealed February 2010
- Other Name is mju Tough 6020
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 674g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
- Released June 2008
- Successor is Sony A380
Olympus 6020 vs Sony A350 Overview
On this page, we are matching up the Olympus 6020 and Sony A350, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by brands Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the 6020 (13MP) and the A350 (14MP) is very well matched but the 6020 (1/2.3") and A350 (APS-C) provide different sensor size.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe 6020 was announced 21 months after the A350 making them a generation away from each other. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus 6020 being a Compact camera and the Sony A350 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before diving into a complete comparison, here is a quick overview of how the 6020 grades against the A350 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus 6020 vs Sony A350 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A350. The whole galleries are available at Olympus 6020 Gallery & Sony A350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Sony A350
6020 | A350 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2010 | June 2008 | Newer by 21 months |
Reasons to pick Sony A350 over the Olympus 6020
A350 | 6020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very exact focus | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Olympus 6020 and Sony A350
6020 | A350 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 2.7" | 2.7" | Equal display size | |
Display resolution | 230k | 230k | The same display resolution | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch display | No Touch display |
Olympus 6020 vs Sony A350 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to travel with your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus 6020 enjoys exterior dimensions of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Sony A350 has specifications of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") having a weight of 674 grams (1.49 lbs).
Check the Olympus 6020 and Sony A350 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you select at that time. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the 6020 vs the A350.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the 6020 and A350 is 95 and 62 respectively.
Olympus 6020 vs Sony A350 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be tough to picture the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by checking technical specs. The image here will provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the 6020 and A350.
As you can tell, both of these cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The 6020 with its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field tougher and the Sony A350 will resolve greater detail with its extra 1MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The newer 6020 provides a benefit in sensor innovation.
Olympus 6020 vs Sony A350 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 6020 vs Sony A350 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A350 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A350 |
Alternative name | mju Tough 6020 | - |
Category | Waterproof | Entry-Level DSLR |
Revealed | 2010-02-02 | 2008-06-06 |
Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 372.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 13 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4592 x 3056 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 143 |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.49x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1/4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video data format | H.264 | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 122 grams (0.27 lbs) | 674 grams (1.49 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 65 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.6 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.5 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 595 |
Other | ||
Battery model | Li-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | Compact Flash (Type I or II), Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, UDMA Mode 5, Supports FAT12 / FAT16 / FAT32 |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $279 | $600 |