Clicky

Olympus 6020 vs Sony A350

Portability
95
Imaging
36
Features
32
Overall
34
Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A350 front
Portability
62
Imaging
53
Features
47
Overall
50

Olympus 6020 vs Sony A350 Key Specs

Olympus 6020
(Full Review)
  • 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
  • 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
  • Revealed February 2010
  • Other Name is mju Tough 6020
Sony A350
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 674g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
  • Released June 2008
  • Successor is Sony A380
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus 6020 vs Sony A350 Overview

On this page, we are matching up the Olympus 6020 and Sony A350, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by brands Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the 6020 (13MP) and the A350 (14MP) is very well matched but the 6020 (1/2.3") and A350 (APS-C) provide different sensor size.

Photography Glossary

The 6020 was announced 21 months after the A350 making them a generation away from each other. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus 6020 being a Compact camera and the Sony A350 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before diving into a complete comparison, here is a quick overview of how the 6020 grades against the A350 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Sony A350

 6020 A350 
ReleasedFebruary 2010June 2008Newer by 21 months

Reasons to pick Sony A350 over the Olympus 6020

 A350 6020 
Manually focus Very exact focus
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display

Common features in the Olympus 6020 and Sony A350

 6020 A350 
Display dimensions2.7"2.7"Equal display size
Display resolution230k230kThe same display resolution
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch display No Touch display

Olympus 6020 vs Sony A350 Physical Comparison

If you're planning to travel with your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus 6020 enjoys exterior dimensions of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Sony A350 has specifications of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") having a weight of 674 grams (1.49 lbs).

Check the Olympus 6020 and Sony A350 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you select at that time. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the 6020 vs the A350.

Olympus 6020 vs Sony A350 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the 6020 and A350 is 95 and 62 respectively.

Olympus 6020 vs Sony A350 top view buttons comparison

Olympus 6020 vs Sony A350 Sensor Comparison

Often, it can be tough to picture the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by checking technical specs. The image here will provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the 6020 and A350.

As you can tell, both of these cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The 6020 with its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field tougher and the Sony A350 will resolve greater detail with its extra 1MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The newer 6020 provides a benefit in sensor innovation.

Olympus 6020 vs Sony A350 sensor size comparison

Olympus 6020 vs Sony A350 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus 6020 vs Sony A350 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus 6020
Portrait photography with Sony A350
28
decent sensor resolution (13MP)
lack of manual focus
no manual mode
cannot use external flash
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
71
has manual focus
MP count decent (14MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
supports RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus 6020
Street photography with Sony A350
66
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proofing
lighter than competition (122 grams)
fixed screen
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
66
tilting screen
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
supports RAW files
heavier than competitors in class (674 grams)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus 6020
Sports photography with Sony A350
43
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (13 megapixels)
includes tracking focus
weather proofing
very slow continuous shooting (5.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
66
image stabilization (Sensor based)
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
supports phase detect auto focus
max frames per second very slow (3.0 frames per second)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Olympus 6020 Travel photography highlights
Sony A350 Travel photography highlights
70
lighter than competition (122g)
weather proofing
decent sensor resolution (13MP)
has built in flash
rather wide (28mm)
missing Timelapse recording
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.9)
51
MP count decent (14MP)
flash built-in
lack of Time Lapse recording
heavier than competitors in class (674g)
screen isn't selfie friendly
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Olympus 6020 Landscape photography features
Sony A350 Landscape photography features
40
rather wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (13 megapixels)
weather proofing
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.9)
screen is small (2.7")
no manual mode
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
missing Timelapse recording
64
has manual focus
change lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
MP count decent (14MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
supports RAW files
small screen (2.7 inch)
lack of Time Lapse recording
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus 6020
Vlogging with Sony A350
31
rather wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (122g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.9)
screen is not selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing microphone jack
9
no video shooting
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus 6020 vs Sony A350 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus 6020 and Sony A350
 Olympus Stylus Tough 6020Sony Alpha DSLR-A350
General Information
Company Olympus Sony
Model Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 Sony Alpha DSLR-A350
Alternative name mju Tough 6020 -
Category Waterproof Entry-Level DSLR
Revealed 2010-02-02 2008-06-06
Body design Compact Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic III -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.08 x 4.56mm 23.6 x 15.8mm
Sensor surface area 27.7mm² 372.9mm²
Sensor resolution 13 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4288 x 3216 4592 x 3056
Highest native ISO 1600 3200
Min native ISO 64 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens Sony/Minolta Alpha
Lens focal range 28-140mm (5.0x) -
Maximal aperture f/3.9-5.9 -
Macro focus range 1cm -
Total lenses - 143
Crop factor 5.9 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Tilting
Screen sizing 2.7 inches 2.7 inches
Screen resolution 230 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage - 95%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.49x
Features
Min shutter speed 1/4 seconds 30 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 5.0 frames/s 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 4.00 m 12.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) -
Highest video resolution 1280x720 None
Video data format H.264 -
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 122 grams (0.27 lbs) 674 grams (1.49 lbs)
Physical dimensions 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested 65
DXO Color Depth score not tested 22.6
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 11.5
DXO Low light score not tested 595
Other
Battery model Li-50B -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 seconds) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC, Internal Compact Flash (Type I or II), Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, UDMA Mode 5, Supports FAT12 / FAT16 / FAT32
Storage slots One One
Cost at release $279 $600