Olympus 6020 vs Sony HX300
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
63 Imaging
44 Features
51 Overall
46
Olympus 6020 vs Sony HX300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Revealed February 2010
- Alternative Name is mju Tough 6020
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
- 623g - 130 x 103 x 93mm
- Announced February 2013
- Replaced the Sony HX200V
- Updated by Sony HX400V
Olympus 6020 vs Sony HX300 Overview
The following is a in depth comparison of the Olympus 6020 versus Sony HX300, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Sony. There exists a sizable gap among the resolutions of the 6020 (13MP) and HX300 (20MP) but they use the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe 6020 was launched 4 years prior to the HX300 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus 6020 being a Compact camera and the Sony HX300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going in to a detailed comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the 6020 matches up vs the HX300 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus 6020 vs Sony HX300 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus 6020 Gallery & Sony HX300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Sony HX300
6020 | HX300 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony HX300 over the Olympus 6020
HX300 | 6020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2013 | February 2010 | Newer by 37 months | |
Focus manually | More exact focusing | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 921k | 230k | Crisper display (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 6020 and Sony HX300
6020 | HX300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Olympus 6020 vs Sony HX300 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera often, you'll have to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus 6020 has exterior measurements of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs) while the Sony HX300 has specifications of 130mm x 103mm x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") having a weight of 623 grams (1.37 lbs).
See the Olympus 6020 versus Sony HX300 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the 6020 versus the HX300.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the 6020 and HX300 is 95 and 63 respectively.
Olympus 6020 vs Sony HX300 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be hard to see the difference in sensor dimensions only by going through a spec sheet. The pic below may give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the 6020 and HX300.
As you can see, both of those cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Sony HX300 to produce extra detail utilizing its extra 7MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images much more aggressively. The more aged 6020 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus 6020 vs Sony HX300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 6020 vs Sony HX300 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 |
Also Known as | mju Tough 6020 | - |
Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2010-02-02 | 2013-02-20 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 13 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5184 x 3888 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.8-6.3 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 921k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1/4s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 122g (0.27 lb) | 623g (1.37 lb) |
Dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 130 x 103 x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | Li-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | - |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $279 | $339 |