Olympus 6020 vs Sony QX10
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
96 Imaging
42 Features
34 Overall
38
Olympus 6020 vs Sony QX10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Released February 2010
- Also Known as mju Tough 6020
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1440 x 1080 video
- 25-250mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 105g - 62 x 62 x 33mm
- Released September 2013
Olympus 6020 vs Sony QX10 Overview
Here, we are contrasting the Olympus 6020 versus Sony QX10, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Lens-style by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There exists a sizable gap among the image resolutions of the 6020 (13MP) and QX10 (18MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe 6020 was unveiled 4 years earlier than the QX10 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus 6020 being a Compact camera and the Sony QX10 being a Lens-style camera.
Before going straight to a complete comparison, here is a short summary of how the 6020 matches up against the QX10 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus 6020 vs Sony QX10 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX10. The full galleries are provided at Olympus 6020 Gallery & Sony QX10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Sony QX10
6020 | QX10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 2.7" | " | Larger display (+2.7") | |
Display resolution | 230k | 0k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony QX10 over the Olympus 6020
QX10 | 6020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2013 | February 2010 | Newer by 43 months | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus 6020 and Sony QX10
6020 | QX10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | No manual focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus 6020 vs Sony QX10 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus 6020 features exterior measurements of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs) while the Sony QX10 has proportions of 62mm x 62mm x 33mm (2.4" x 2.4" x 1.3") having a weight of 105 grams (0.23 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus 6020 versus Sony QX10 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are using at the time. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the 6020 versus the QX10.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the 6020 and QX10 is 95 and 96 respectively.
Olympus 6020 vs Sony QX10 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be hard to envision the gap in sensor dimensions simply by checking out technical specs. The image below should provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the 6020 and QX10.
As you have seen, each of these cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same resolution. You can anticipate the Sony QX10 to show more detail having an extra 5MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop images way more aggressively. The more aged 6020 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus 6020 vs Sony QX10 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 6020 vs Sony QX10 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX10 |
Also Known as | mju Tough 6020 | - |
Type | Waterproof | Lens-style |
Released | 2010-02-02 | 2013-09-04 |
Body design | Compact | Lens-style |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 13 megapixel | 18 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4896 x 3672 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | - |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 0k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | - | Depends on connected smartphone |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1/4 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | None |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1440 x 1080 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1440x1080 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 122g (0.27 lbs) | 105g (0.23 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 62 x 62 x 33mm (2.4" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 220 images |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-50B | NP-BN, |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2, 10 secs) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $279 | $250 |