Olympus 6020 vs Sony QX30
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
91 Imaging
45 Features
37 Overall
41
Olympus 6020 vs Sony QX30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Launched February 2010
- Additionally referred to as mju Tough 6020
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-720mm (F3.5-6.3) lens
- 193g - 68 x 65 x 58mm
- Announced September 2014
Olympus 6020 vs Sony QX30 Overview
On this page, we are contrasting the Olympus 6020 versus Sony QX30, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Lens-style by brands Olympus and Sony. There exists a sizable gap among the image resolutions of the 6020 (13MP) and QX30 (20MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe 6020 was launched 5 years before the QX30 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus 6020 being a Compact camera and the Sony QX30 being a Lens-style camera.
Before we go into a in-depth comparison, here is a short view of how the 6020 grades vs the QX30 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus 6020 vs Sony QX30 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX30. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus 6020 Gallery & Sony QX30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Sony QX30
6020 | QX30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 2.7" | " | Larger display (+2.7") | |
Display resolution | 230k | 0k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony QX30 over the Olympus 6020
QX30 | 6020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2014 | February 2010 | Newer by 55 months | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus 6020 and Sony QX30
6020 | QX30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Lack of manual focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen |
Olympus 6020 vs Sony QX30 Physical Comparison
If you are going to travel with your camera often, you will have to factor its weight and size. The Olympus 6020 offers outside dimensions of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Sony QX30 has specifications of 68mm x 65mm x 58mm (2.7" x 2.6" x 2.3") and a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus 6020 versus Sony QX30 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you choose at that time. Below is a front view over all size comparison of the 6020 compared to the QX30.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the 6020 and QX30 is 95 and 91 respectively.
Olympus 6020 vs Sony QX30 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very tough to visualise the contrast in sensor dimensions purely by researching a spec sheet. The pic below may give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the 6020 and QX30.
As you can see, both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Sony QX30 to render more detail utilizing its extra 7 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos more aggressively. The more aged 6020 will be behind in sensor innovation.
Olympus 6020 vs Sony QX30 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 6020 vs Sony QX30 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX30 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX30 |
Also called as | mju Tough 6020 | - |
Class | Waterproof | Lens-style |
Launched | 2010-02-02 | 2014-09-03 |
Physical type | Compact | Lens-style |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 13 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5184 x 3888 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-720mm (30.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.5-6.3 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7" | - |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 0 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1/4 secs | 4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | None |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 122g (0.27 lbs) | 193g (0.43 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 68 x 65 x 58mm (2.7" x 2.6" x 2.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 200 pictures |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-50B | NP-BN, |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2, 10 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail price | $279 | $348 |