Olympus 6020 vs Sony RX100 II
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
89 Imaging
51 Features
74 Overall
60
Olympus 6020 vs Sony RX100 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Revealed February 2010
- Other Name is mju Tough 6020
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 160 - 12800 (Increase to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 281g - 102 x 58 x 38mm
- Launched June 2013
- Older Model is Sony RX100
- Updated by Sony RX100 III
Olympus 6020 vs Sony RX100 II Overview
Here, we will be looking at the Olympus 6020 and Sony RX100 II, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Sony. There is a sizable difference between the image resolutions of the 6020 (13MP) and RX100 II (20MP) and the 6020 (1/2.3") and RX100 II (1") boast totally different sensor measurements.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe 6020 was launched 4 years earlier than the RX100 II and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus 6020 being a Compact camera and the Sony RX100 II being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before going right into a complete comparison, here is a brief overview of how the 6020 matches up against the RX100 II when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus 6020 vs Sony RX100 II Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 II. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus 6020 Gallery & Sony RX100 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Sony RX100 II
6020 | RX100 II |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony RX100 II over the Olympus 6020
RX100 II | 6020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | June 2013 | February 2010 | Fresher by 41 months | |
Manually focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 1229k | 230k | Clearer screen (+999k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 6020 and Sony RX100 II
6020 | RX100 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Lacking Touch screen |
Olympus 6020 vs Sony RX100 II Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry your camera frequently, you are going to need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus 6020 provides outside dimensions of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Sony RX100 II has measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 38mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 281 grams (0.62 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus 6020 and Sony RX100 II in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are working with at the time. Here is a front view size comparison of the 6020 and the RX100 II.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the 6020 and RX100 II is 95 and 89 respectively.
Olympus 6020 vs Sony RX100 II Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is hard to see the gap between sensor sizing just by checking technical specs. The graphic below may provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the 6020 and RX100 II.
As you have seen, both of these cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The 6020 because of its tinier sensor will make getting shallow depth of field more difficult and the Sony RX100 II will resolve more detail utilizing its extra 7MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures way more aggressively. The older 6020 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Olympus 6020 vs Sony RX100 II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 6020 vs Sony RX100 II Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 II |
Otherwise known as | mju Tough 6020 | - |
Class | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2010-02-02 | 2013-06-27 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 13 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 160 |
RAW format | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-100mm (3.6x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/1.8-4.9 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 1,229k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display tech | - | Xtra Fine WhiteMagic TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1/4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 15.00 m (ISO Auto (W)) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/2000 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 122g (0.27 lbs) | 281g (0.62 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 102 x 58 x 38mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 67 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.5 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.4 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 483 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 350 shots |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-50B | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (10 sec. / 2 sec. / Self-portrait One-person/ Self-portrait Two-person/ Self timer Continuous (3 or 5 shots)) |
Time lapse feature | With downloadable app | |
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $279 | $598 |