Olympus 6020 vs Sony RX100 VA
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f83bd/f83bdf39352a979ef5fa8b296f80d35d80574119" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 front Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4cddf/4cddf48ab8a3b250116bee02e29a58a03a8cfb8a" alt="Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V(A) front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V(A) front"/Sony-RX100-VA-front.jpg)
89 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
Olympus 6020 vs Sony RX100 VA Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Announced February 2010
- Additionally Known as mju Tough 6020
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Raise to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-70mm (F1.8-2.8) lens
- 299g - 102 x 58 x 41mm
- Introduced July 2018
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus 6020 vs Sony RX100 VA Overview
Here, we are comparing the Olympus 6020 vs Sony RX100 VA, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Sony. There is a crucial difference between the sensor resolutions of the 6020 (13MP) and RX100 VA (20MP) and the 6020 (1/2.3") and RX100 VA (1") boast totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The 6020 was launched 9 years before the RX100 VA which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus 6020 being a Compact camera and the Sony RX100 VA being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the 6020 scores versus the RX100 VA in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus 6020 vs Sony RX100 VA Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V(A). The complete galleries are provided at Olympus 6020 Gallery and Sony RX100 VA Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Sony RX100 VA
6020 | RX100 VA |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony RX100 VA over the Olympus 6020
RX100 VA | 6020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | July 2018 | ![]() | February 2010 | More modern by 102 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 1229k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+999k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Common features in the Olympus 6020 and Sony RX100 VA
6020 | RX100 VA | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Olympus 6020 vs Sony RX100 VA Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera, you should take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus 6020 offers exterior measurements of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Sony RX100 VA has measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 41mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 299 grams (0.66 lbs).
See the Olympus 6020 vs Sony RX100 VA in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the 6020 against the RX100 VA.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/591ca/591cad458b9d7f54706f70ae68ec81198605ccd9" alt="Olympus 6020 vs Sony RX100 VA size comparison Olympus 6020 vs Sony RX100 VA size comparison"-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the 6020 and RX100 VA is 95 and 89 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/591ca/591cad458b9d7f54706f70ae68ec81198605ccd9" alt="Olympus 6020 vs Sony RX100 VA top view buttons comparison Olympus 6020 vs Sony RX100 VA top view buttons comparison"-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Olympus 6020 vs Sony RX100 VA Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very difficult to envision the contrast between sensor sizes purely by reading specs. The image below may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the 6020 and RX100 VA.
All in all, both of those cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The 6020 due to its tinier sensor will make achieving shallower DOF trickier and the Sony RX100 VA will deliver more detail utilizing its extra 7 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images way more aggressively. The more aged 6020 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ea46b/ea46b140ed38e43112ec1567a68b6857605e8a7c" alt="Olympus 6020 vs Sony RX100 VA sensor size comparison Olympus 6020 vs Sony RX100 VA sensor size comparison"-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Olympus 6020 vs Sony RX100 VA Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/591ca/591cad458b9d7f54706f70ae68ec81198605ccd9" alt="Olympus 6020 vs Sony RX100 VA Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus 6020 vs Sony RX100 VA Screen and Viewfinder comparison"-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus 6020 vs Sony RX100 VA Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V(A) | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V(A) |
Otherwise known as | mju Tough 6020 | - |
Class | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2010-02-02 | 2018-07-13 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 13MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 315 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-70mm (2.9x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/1.8-2.8 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 1,229k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.59x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1/4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Fastest silent shutter speed | - | 1/32000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames per sec | 24.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 10.20 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, Flash On, Slow Synchro, Rear Sync, Flash Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/2000 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | NP-BX1 lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 122 gr (0.27 lb) | 299 gr (0.66 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 102 x 58 x 41mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 220 photographs |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-50B | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at release | $279 | $998 |