Olympus 6020 vs Sony TX20
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
96 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43
Olympus 6020 vs Sony TX20 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Launched February 2010
- Additionally referred to as mju Tough 6020
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
- 133g - 96 x 56 x 18mm
- Revealed February 2012
Olympus 6020 vs Sony TX20 Overview
Below, we are analyzing the Olympus 6020 vs Sony TX20, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Ultracompact by rivals Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the 6020 (13MP) and the TX20 (16MP) is fairly comparable and they feature the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe 6020 was released 3 years before the TX20 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus 6020 being a Compact camera and the Sony TX20 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving through a full comparison, below is a simple view of how the 6020 grades vs the TX20 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus 6020 vs Sony TX20 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX20. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus 6020 Gallery & Sony TX20 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Sony TX20
6020 | TX20 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony TX20 over the Olympus 6020
TX20 | 6020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2012 | February 2010 | More recent by 25 months | |
Focus manually | Very accurate focusing | |||
Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 922k | 230k | Sharper display (+692k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus 6020 and Sony TX20
6020 | TX20 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen |
Olympus 6020 vs Sony TX20 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to lug around your camera, you will have to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus 6020 provides outer dimensions of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs) while the Sony TX20 has sizing of 96mm x 56mm x 18mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 133 grams (0.29 lbs).
Check the Olympus 6020 vs Sony TX20 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are using at that time. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the 6020 against the TX20.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the 6020 and TX20 is 95 and 96 respectively.
Olympus 6020 vs Sony TX20 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be difficult to picture the gap in sensor measurements purely by checking out specs. The visual underneath should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the 6020 and TX20.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Sony TX20 to provide extra detail as a result of its extra 3 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The older 6020 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus 6020 vs Sony TX20 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 6020 vs Sony TX20 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX20 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX20 |
Also called as | mju Tough 6020 | - |
Category | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2010-02-02 | 2012-02-28 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 13 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.5-4.6 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 922 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display tech | - | XtraFine TruBlack TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1/4s | 4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shutter rate | 5.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | 3.70 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 122g (0.27 pounds) | 133g (0.29 pounds) |
Dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 96 x 56 x 18mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 250 images |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-50B | NP-BN |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $279 | $330 |