Olympus 6020 vs Sony TX200V
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f83bd/f83bdf39352a979ef5fa8b296f80d35d80574119" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 front Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/91d06/91d06e64750ff9ea247ef7d29955562c9a21441b" alt="Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V front"
96 Imaging
42 Features
48 Overall
44
Olympus 6020 vs Sony TX200V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Revealed February 2010
- Alternate Name is mju Tough 6020
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 129g - 96 x 58 x 16mm
- Launched January 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus 6020 vs Sony TX200V Overview
In this article, we will be matching up the Olympus 6020 versus Sony TX200V, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Olympus and Sony. There is a significant difference among the image resolutions of the 6020 (13MP) and TX200V (18MP) but they possess the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The 6020 was manufactured 24 months before the TX200V which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus 6020 being a Compact camera and the Sony TX200V being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief view of how the 6020 scores against the TX200V in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus 6020 vs Sony TX200V Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V. The entire galleries are available at Olympus 6020 Gallery and Sony TX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Sony TX200V
6020 | TX200V |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony TX200V over the Olympus 6020
TX200V | 6020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2012 | ![]() | February 2010 | More recent by 24 months |
Screen sizing | 3.3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.6") |
Screen resolution | 1230k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+1000k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus 6020 and Sony TX200V
6020 | TX200V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | No manual focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus 6020 vs Sony TX200V Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to lug around your camera frequently, you'll have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus 6020 offers physical measurements of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Sony TX200V has measurements of 96mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") and a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus 6020 versus Sony TX200V in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Here is the front view size comparison of the 6020 and the TX200V.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f5247/f52478b07ac87b2160a405886e955926c5871479" alt="Olympus 6020 vs Sony TX200V size comparison Olympus 6020 vs Sony TX200V size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the 6020 and TX200V is 95 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6e32e/6e32e788635acaa1fa5653fd7133517955b8cd6c" alt="Olympus 6020 vs Sony TX200V top view buttons comparison Olympus 6020 vs Sony TX200V top view buttons comparison"
Olympus 6020 vs Sony TX200V Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's tough to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements only by researching a spec sheet. The graphic below will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the 6020 and TX200V.
As you can see, both of those cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You should expect the Sony TX200V to render greater detail due to its extra 5MP. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures far more aggressively. The older 6020 will be behind in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e24e/7e24eb3baaae925a5e26d9983d3da7979a16f157" alt="Olympus 6020 vs Sony TX200V sensor size comparison Olympus 6020 vs Sony TX200V sensor size comparison"
Olympus 6020 vs Sony TX200V Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a2cf0/a2cf05c5f7d12d0e45039a63a7e185cbd18d1003" alt="Olympus 6020 vs Sony TX200V Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus 6020 vs Sony TX200V Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus 6020 vs Sony TX200V Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V |
Also Known as | mju Tough 6020 | - |
Category | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2010-02-02 | 2012-01-30 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 13 megapixels | 18 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4896 x 3672 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 64 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.5-4.8 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3.3 inches |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 1,230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display technology | - | 1,229,760 dots equiv. XtraFine TruBlack OLED display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1/4s | 2s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 3.10 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 122g (0.27 lbs) | 129g (0.28 lbs) |
Dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 96 x 58 x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 220 photos |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-50B | NP-BN |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail pricing | $279 | $500 |