Olympus 6020 vs Sony TX30
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
96 Imaging
42 Features
43 Overall
42
Olympus 6020 vs Sony TX30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Revealed February 2010
- Alternate Name is mju Tough 6020
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 141g - 96 x 59 x 15mm
- Launched July 2013
Olympus 6020 vs Sony TX30 Overview
Below is a extended overview of the Olympus 6020 and Sony TX30, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Ultracompact by competitors Olympus and Sony. There exists a big gap between the sensor resolutions of the 6020 (13MP) and TX30 (18MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe 6020 was manufactured 4 years prior to the TX30 and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus 6020 being a Compact camera and the Sony TX30 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick summation of how the 6020 grades vs the TX30 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus 6020 vs Sony TX30 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus 6020 Gallery and Sony TX30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Sony TX30
6020 | TX30 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony TX30 over the Olympus 6020
TX30 | 6020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | July 2013 | February 2010 | More recent by 42 months | |
Focus manually | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Display dimensions | 3.3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.6") | |
Display resolution | 1229k | 230k | Sharper display (+999k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus 6020 and Sony TX30
6020 | TX30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen |
Olympus 6020 vs Sony TX30 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to lug around your camera regularly, you are going to need to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus 6020 features external measurements of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Sony TX30 has measurements of 96mm x 59mm x 15mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") and a weight of 141 grams (0.31 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus 6020 and Sony TX30 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you use at that time. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the 6020 vs the TX30.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the 6020 and TX30 is 95 and 96 respectively.
Olympus 6020 vs Sony TX30 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very tough to see the gap between sensor measurements only by reviewing a spec sheet. The photograph here will help offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the 6020 and TX30.
As you can see, the two cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same megapixels. You should anticipate the Sony TX30 to deliver extra detail due to its extra 5MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images more aggressively. The older 6020 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus 6020 vs Sony TX30 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 6020 vs Sony TX30 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30 |
Also called as | mju Tough 6020 | - |
Type | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2010-02-02 | 2013-07-26 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 13MP | 18MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4896 x 3672 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.5-4.8 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7" | 3.3" |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 1,229 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display tech | - | OLED monitor |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1/4 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264 | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 122 grams (0.27 pounds) | 141 grams (0.31 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 96 x 59 x 15mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | Li-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | - |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $279 | $230 |