Olympus 8000 vs Olympus TG-610
94 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
93 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
Olympus 8000 vs Olympus TG-610 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 182g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Other Name is mju Tough 8000
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 190g - 96 x 65 x 26mm
- Released January 2011
Olympus 8000 vs Olympus TG-610 Overview
Let's look a bit more closely at the Olympus 8000 versus Olympus TG-610, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof and both of them are offered by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the 8000 (12MP) and the TG-610 (14MP) is pretty well matched and they use the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe 8000 was unveiled 18 months earlier than the TG-610 which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a in depth comparison, below is a brief summation of how the 8000 scores vs the TG-610 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus 8000 vs Olympus TG-610 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 & Olympus TG-610. The full galleries are available at Olympus 8000 Gallery & Olympus TG-610 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 8000 over the Olympus TG-610
8000 | TG-610 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-610 over the Olympus 8000
TG-610 | 8000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2011 | July 2009 | More recent by 18 months | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 8000 and Olympus TG-610
8000 | TG-610 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | No manual focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Olympus 8000 vs Olympus TG-610 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to lug around your camera frequently, you'll have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus 8000 has got exterior measurements of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 182 grams (0.40 lbs) while the Olympus TG-610 has dimensions of 96mm x 65mm x 26mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Look at the Olympus 8000 versus Olympus TG-610 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at the time. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the 8000 vs the TG-610.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the 8000 and TG-610 is 94 and 93 respectively.
Olympus 8000 vs Olympus TG-610 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is tough to imagine the contrast between sensor measurements simply by reading through specs. The visual underneath will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the 8000 and TG-610.
All in all, the two cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Olympus TG-610 to resolve extra detail having an extra 2MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots much more aggressively. The older 8000 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Olympus 8000 vs Olympus TG-610 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 8000 vs Olympus TG-610 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Olympus TG-610 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Olympus TG-610 |
Alternative name | mju Tough 8000 | - |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2009-07-01 | 2011-01-06 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 2cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Hypercrystal III Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1/4 secs | 4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 4.20 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 182 gr (0.40 lbs) | 190 gr (0.42 lbs) |
Dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 96 x 65 x 26mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 210 photos |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $380 | $223 |