Olympus 8000 vs Olympus VG-145
94 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
96 Imaging
37 Features
24 Overall
31
Olympus 8000 vs Olympus VG-145 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 182g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Announced July 2009
- Alternate Name is mju Tough 8000
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 120g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Launched July 2011
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus 8000 vs Olympus VG-145 Overview
Let's look more in depth at the Olympus 8000 vs Olympus VG-145, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact and both are sold by Olympus. The resolution of the 8000 (12MP) and the VG-145 (14MP) is relatively close and both cameras have the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe 8000 was brought out 3 years before the VG-145 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus 8000 being a Compact camera and the Olympus VG-145 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting right into a complete comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the 8000 grades against the VG-145 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus 8000 vs Olympus VG-145 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 & Olympus VG-145. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus 8000 Gallery & Olympus VG-145 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 8000 over the Olympus VG-145
| 8000 | VG-145 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-145 over the Olympus 8000
| VG-145 | 8000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | July 2011 | July 2009 | Fresher by 25 months | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Common features in the Olympus 8000 and Olympus VG-145
| 8000 | VG-145 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | No manual focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Equal screen resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Olympus 8000 vs Olympus VG-145 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry your camera, you will want to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus 8000 offers outside measurements of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 182 grams (0.40 lbs) whilst the Olympus VG-145 has specifications of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 120 grams (0.26 lbs).
See the Olympus 8000 vs Olympus VG-145 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the 8000 against the VG-145.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the 8000 and VG-145 is 94 and 96 respectively.
Olympus 8000 vs Olympus VG-145 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be difficult to picture the gap in sensor sizing simply by viewing a spec sheet. The graphic underneath will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the 8000 and VG-145.
Clearly, both of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You can count on the Olympus VG-145 to result in more detail having its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The older 8000 will be behind in sensor innovation.
Olympus 8000 vs Olympus VG-145 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus 8000 vs Olympus VG-145 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Olympus VG-145 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Olympus VG-145 |
| Otherwise known as | mju Tough 8000 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2009-07-01 | 2011-07-27 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 |
| Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/2.8-6.5 |
| Macro focus range | 2cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1/4 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | 4.40 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 182 grams (0.40 lbs) | 120 grams (0.26 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 160 images |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | LI-70B |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $380 | $0 |