Olympus 8000 vs Olympus VR-320
94 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Olympus 8000 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 182g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Announced July 2009
- Also Known as mju Tough 8000
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Introduced July 2011
- Successor is Olympus VR-330
Olympus 8000 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
In this article, we will be analyzing the Olympus 8000 and Olympus VR-320, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are offered by Olympus. The image resolution of the 8000 (12MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is pretty comparable and they enjoy the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe 8000 was announced 24 months before the VR-320 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a in depth comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the 8000 grades versus the VR-320 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus 8000 vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 & Olympus VR-320. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus 8000 Gallery & Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 8000 over the Olympus VR-320
8000 | VR-320 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Olympus 8000
VR-320 | 8000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | July 2011 | July 2009 | More modern by 24 months | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Common features in the Olympus 8000 and Olympus VR-320
8000 | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | No manual focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | The same screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither contains Touch screen |
Olympus 8000 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry around your camera regularly, you need to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus 8000 has got outside dimensions of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 182 grams (0.40 lbs) and the Olympus VR-320 has measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Compare the Olympus 8000 and Olympus VR-320 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are employing at that time. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the 8000 versus the VR-320.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the 8000 and VR-320 is 94 and 94 respectively.
Olympus 8000 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is tough to picture the difference in sensor sizes only by going through specifications. The pic underneath might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the 8000 and VR-320.
Plainly, the 2 cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Olympus VR-320 to provide extra detail with its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots a little more aggressively. The more aged 8000 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus 8000 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 8000 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Olympus VR-320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Olympus VR-320 |
Also Known as | mju Tough 8000 | - |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2009-07-01 | 2011-07-19 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 |
Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 2cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1/4 secs | 4 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 4.70 m |
Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 182 gr (0.40 pounds) | 158 gr (0.35 pounds) |
Dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | - | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $380 | $179 |