Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FH2
94 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
96 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FH2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 182g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Additionally Known as mju Tough 8000
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F3.1-6.5) lens
- 121g - 94 x 54 x 19mm
- Announced January 2011
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-FS16
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FH2 Overview
Its time to examine more closely at the Olympus 8000 versus Panasonic FH2, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the 8000 (12MP) and the FH2 (14MP) is fairly similar and they use the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe 8000 was manufactured 18 months earlier than the FH2 making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a detailed comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the 8000 scores vs the FH2 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FH2 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH2. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus 8000 Gallery and Panasonic FH2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 8000 over the Panasonic FH2
| 8000 | FH2 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH2 over the Olympus 8000
| FH2 | 8000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2011 |  | July 2009 | Fresher by 18 months |
Common features in the Olympus 8000 and Panasonic FH2
| 8000 | FH2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Identical display measurement |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lack of Touch display |
Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FH2 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry your camera, you will want to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus 8000 features physical dimensions of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 182 grams (0.40 lbs) and the Panasonic FH2 has measurements of 94mm x 54mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.7") having a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).
Look at the Olympus 8000 versus Panasonic FH2 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the 8000 compared to the FH2.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the 8000 and FH2 is 94 and 96 respectively.
Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FH2 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very tough to picture the difference between sensor sizing only by reviewing technical specs. The graphic here might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the 8000 and FH2.
As you have seen, each of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You should anticipate the Panasonic FH2 to deliver extra detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics much more aggressively. The older 8000 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FH2 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FH2 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH2 |
| Also called as | mju Tough 8000 | Lumix DMC-FS16 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2009-07-01 | 2011-01-05 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Venus Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/3.1-6.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 2cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 1/4 secs | 60 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 4.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | 3.30 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 182g (0.40 pounds) | 121g (0.27 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 94 x 54 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 270 photos |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $380 | $149 |