Clicky

Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FS42

Portability
94
Imaging
35
Features
21
Overall
29
Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 front
Portability
95
Imaging
33
Features
10
Overall
23

Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FS42 Key Specs

Olympus 8000
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
  • 182g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
  • Launched July 2009
  • Alternate Name is mju Tough 8000
Panasonic FS42
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1000 (Boost to 6400)
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 33-132mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 132g - 98 x 55 x 22mm
  • Revealed April 2009
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FS42 Overview

Here is a extended assessment of the Olympus 8000 versus Panasonic FS42, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the 8000 (12MP) and the FS42 (10MP) is very close but the 8000 (1/2.3") and FS42 (1/2.5") provide totally different sensor sizes.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The 8000 was released 3 months later than the FS42 and they are both of a similar generation. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus 8000 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FS42 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before we go straight to a detailed comparison, here is a short summation of how the 8000 matches up against the FS42 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus 8000 over the Panasonic FS42

 8000 FS42 
Display dimensions2.7"2.5"Larger display (+0.2")

Reasons to pick Panasonic FS42 over the Olympus 8000

 FS42 8000 

Common features in the Olympus 8000 and Panasonic FS42

 8000 FS42 
RevealedJuly 2009April 2009Same generation
Manually focus No manual focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display resolution230k230kExact same display resolution
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly display Lacking Touch friendly display

Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FS42 Physical Comparison

If you are looking to carry your camera regularly, you will want to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus 8000 features exterior dimensions of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 182 grams (0.40 lbs) while the Panasonic FS42 has measurements of 98mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs).

See the Olympus 8000 versus Panasonic FS42 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are using at that moment. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the 8000 and the FS42.

Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FS42 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the 8000 and FS42 is 94 and 95 respectively.

Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FS42 top view buttons comparison

Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FS42 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it is hard to see the contrast in sensor sizing purely by viewing specs. The visual underneath may offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the 8000 and FS42.

All in all, both the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The 8000 because of its larger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field simpler and the Olympus 8000 will render greater detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics a bit more aggressively.

Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FS42 sensor size comparison

Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus 8000 Portrait photography information
Panasonic FS42 Portrait photography information
21
lack of manual focus
no manual control
no external flash support
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
19
focusing manually not possible
no manual control
no external flash support
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.5")
no RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus 8000
Street photography with Panasonic FS42
62
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proofing
screen does not articulate
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
47
fixed screen
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.5")
no RAW files
max ISO too low (1,000)
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus 8000
Sports photography with Panasonic FS42
34
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proofing
lack of shutter priority mode
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
16
max frames per second low (2.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.5")
no phase detect auto focus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Olympus 8000 as a Travel photography camera
Panasonic FS42 as a Travel photography camera
61
weather proofing
built-in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
no Timelapse function
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
51
flash built-in
no Time Lapse recording
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
does not have selfie friendly screen
wide angle not the best (33mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Olympus 8000 as a Landscape photography camera
Panasonic FS42 as a Landscape photography camera
35
reasonably wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proofing
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
small screen (2.7")
no manual control
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
no Timelapse function
22
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (33mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
tiny screen (2.5 inches)
no manual control
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.5")
max ISO too low (1,000)
no RAW files
no Time Lapse recording
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus 8000
Vlogging with Panasonic FS42
28
reasonably wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
video quality not great (640 x 480 pixels)
no microphone socket
22
wide angle not the best (33mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
does not have selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
video quality not great (640 x 480 pxls)
no mic port
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FS42 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus 8000 and Panasonic FS42
 Olympus Stylus Tough 8000Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42
General Information
Brand Olympus Panasonic
Model type Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42
Otherwise known as mju Tough 8000 -
Class Small Sensor Compact Ultracompact
Launched 2009-07-01 2009-04-17
Body design Compact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.5"
Sensor dimensions 6.08 x 4.56mm 5.744 x 4.308mm
Sensor surface area 27.7mm² 24.7mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 3968 x 2976 3648 x 2736
Highest native ISO 1600 1000
Highest enhanced ISO - 6400
Min native ISO 64 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-102mm (3.6x) 33-132mm (4.0x)
Highest aperture f/3.5-5.1 f/2.8-5.9
Macro focusing range 2cm 5cm
Focal length multiplier 5.9 6.3
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.7" 2.5"
Screen resolution 230k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 1/4 secs 60 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter speed - 2.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 4.00 m 6.30 m
Flash settings Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 182 gr (0.40 lbs) 132 gr (0.29 lbs)
Physical dimensions 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") 98 x 55 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (12 seconds) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal SD/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots One One
Pricing at release $380 $580