Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FS42
94 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
95 Imaging
33 Features
10 Overall
23
Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FS42 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 182g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Launched July 2009
- Alternate Name is mju Tough 8000
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1000 (Boost to 6400)
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-132mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 132g - 98 x 55 x 22mm
- Revealed April 2009
Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FS42 Overview
Here is a extended assessment of the Olympus 8000 versus Panasonic FS42, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the 8000 (12MP) and the FS42 (10MP) is very close but the 8000 (1/2.3") and FS42 (1/2.5") provide totally different sensor sizes.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe 8000 was released 3 months later than the FS42 and they are both of a similar generation. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus 8000 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FS42 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go straight to a detailed comparison, here is a short summation of how the 8000 matches up against the FS42 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FS42 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus 8000 Gallery and Panasonic FS42 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 8000 over the Panasonic FS42
8000 | FS42 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 2.7" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS42 over the Olympus 8000
FS42 | 8000 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus 8000 and Panasonic FS42
8000 | FS42 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | July 2009 | April 2009 | Same generation | |
Manually focus | No manual focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Exact same display resolution | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FS42 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry your camera regularly, you will want to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus 8000 features exterior dimensions of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 182 grams (0.40 lbs) while the Panasonic FS42 has measurements of 98mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs).
See the Olympus 8000 versus Panasonic FS42 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are using at that moment. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the 8000 and the FS42.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the 8000 and FS42 is 94 and 95 respectively.
Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FS42 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is hard to see the contrast in sensor sizing purely by viewing specs. The visual underneath may offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the 8000 and FS42.
All in all, both the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The 8000 because of its larger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field simpler and the Olympus 8000 will render greater detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics a bit more aggressively.
Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FS42 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 |
Otherwise known as | mju Tough 8000 | - |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2009-07-01 | 2009-04-17 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.5" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 24.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1000 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 33-132mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 2cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 6.3 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | 2.5" |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1/4 secs | 60 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 6.30 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 182 gr (0.40 lbs) | 132 gr (0.29 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 98 x 55 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $380 | $580 |