Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FS7
94 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
95 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FS7 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 182g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Launched July 2009
- Also Known as mju Tough 8000
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Expand to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-132mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 139g - 97 x 54 x 22mm
- Launched January 2009
Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FS7 Overview
Below is a complete review of the Olympus 8000 versus Panasonic FS7, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the 8000 (12MP) and the FS7 (10MP) is very close but the 8000 (1/2.3") and FS7 (1/2.5") provide different sensor sizes.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe 8000 was revealed 6 months later than the FS7 and they are both of a similar age. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus 8000 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FS7 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the 8000 matches up versus the FS7 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FS7 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS7. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus 8000 Gallery & Panasonic FS7 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 8000 over the Panasonic FS7
8000 | FS7 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS7 over the Olympus 8000
FS7 | 8000 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus 8000 and Panasonic FS7
8000 | FS7 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | July 2009 | January 2009 | Same age | |
Manually focus | No manual focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display size | 2.7" | 2.7" | Same display dimensions | |
Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Exact same display resolution | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Lacking Touch display |
Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FS7 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to lug around your camera, you're going to have to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus 8000 enjoys exterior dimensions of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 182 grams (0.40 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FS7 has sizing of 97mm x 54mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.1" x 0.9") with a weight of 139 grams (0.31 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus 8000 versus Panasonic FS7 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you use during that time. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the 8000 vs the FS7.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the 8000 and FS7 is 94 and 95 respectively.
Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FS7 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very hard to picture the contrast in sensor measurements simply by looking through technical specs. The visual below may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the 8000 and FS7.
As you can tell, both of those cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The 8000 with its larger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh less difficult and the Olympus 8000 will render extra detail because of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop photos way more aggressively.
Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FS7 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FS7 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS7 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS7 |
Also Known as | mju Tough 8000 | - |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2009-07-01 | 2009-01-16 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.5" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 24.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 33-132mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 2cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 6.3 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1/4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, Auto Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 182 gr (0.40 pounds) | 139 gr (0.31 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 97 x 54 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.1" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $380 | $160 |