Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FZ100
94 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
67 Imaging
37 Features
62 Overall
47
Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FZ100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 182g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Announced July 2009
- Alternative Name is mju Tough 8000
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F2.8-5.2) lens
- 540g - 124 x 82 x 92mm
- Announced July 2010
- Later Model is Panasonic FZ200
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FZ100 Overview
Below, we will be contrasting the Olympus 8000 and Panasonic FZ100, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the 8000 (12MP) and the FZ100 (14MP) is pretty comparable and they use the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe 8000 was revealed 12 months before the FZ100 and they are of a similar age. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus 8000 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FZ100 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving straight into a full comparison, below is a simple summary of how the 8000 matches up versus the FZ100 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FZ100 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ100. The full galleries are provided at Olympus 8000 Gallery & Panasonic FZ100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 8000 over the Panasonic FZ100
| 8000 | FZ100 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ100 over the Olympus 8000
| FZ100 | 8000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | July 2010 |  | July 2009 | Newer by 12 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Olympus 8000 and Panasonic FZ100
| 8000 | FZ100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FZ100 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you're going to have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus 8000 offers external dimensions of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 182 grams (0.40 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FZ100 has proportions of 124mm x 82mm x 92mm (4.9" x 3.2" x 3.6") along with a weight of 540 grams (1.19 lbs).
See the Olympus 8000 and Panasonic FZ100 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have attached at that time. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the 8000 and the FZ100.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the 8000 and FZ100 is 94 and 67 respectively.
Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FZ100 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very hard to visualise the gap in sensor dimensions just by going through specs. The picture below will give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the 8000 and FZ100.
All in all, both the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same MP. You can expect the Panasonic FZ100 to produce greater detail because of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The more aged 8000 will be behind in sensor technology.
Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FZ100 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FZ100 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ100 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ100 |
| Also Known as | mju Tough 8000 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2009-07-01 | 2010-07-21 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Venus Engine FHD |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/2.8-5.2 |
| Macro focusing distance | 2cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 1/4 secs | 60 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 11.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | 9.50 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | AVCHD |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 182 gr (0.40 lb) | 540 gr (1.19 lb) |
| Dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 124 x 82 x 92mm (4.9" x 3.2" x 3.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $380 | $500 |