Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FZ1000
94 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28


55 Imaging
51 Features
80 Overall
62
Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 182g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Announced July 2009
- Additionally referred to as mju Tough 8000
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Bump to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-400mm (F2.8-4.0) lens
- 831g - 137 x 99 x 131mm
- Introduced June 2014
- Later Model is Panasonic FZ2500

Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Overview
Following is a complete overview of the Olympus 8000 and Panasonic FZ1000, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Large Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a substantial gap between the image resolutions of the 8000 (12MP) and FZ1000 (20MP) and the 8000 (1/2.3") and FZ1000 (1") offer different sensor sizes.

The 8000 was released 6 years prior to the FZ1000 which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus 8000 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FZ1000 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the 8000 matches up vs the FZ1000 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus 8000 Gallery & Panasonic FZ1000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 8000 over the Panasonic FZ1000
8000 | FZ1000 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ1000 over the Olympus 8000
FZ1000 | 8000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | June 2014 | ![]() | July 2009 | More modern by 60 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 921k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+691k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Common features in the Olympus 8000 and Panasonic FZ1000
8000 | FZ1000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch display | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch display |
Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera frequently, you should take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus 8000 comes with outside measurements of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 182 grams (0.40 lbs) while the Panasonic FZ1000 has proportions of 137mm x 99mm x 131mm (5.4" x 3.9" x 5.2") with a weight of 831 grams (1.83 lbs).
Look at the Olympus 8000 and Panasonic FZ1000 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are working with during that time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the 8000 versus the FZ1000.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the 8000 and FZ1000 is 94 and 55 respectively.

Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its tough to visualize the gap between sensor sizes simply by going over technical specs. The picture below will provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the 8000 and FZ1000.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The 8000 because of its tinier sensor is going to make achieving bokeh more challenging and the Panasonic FZ1000 will offer you extra detail as a result of its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos more aggressively. The more aged 8000 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 |
Also referred to as | mju Tough 8000 | - |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2009-07-01 | 2014-06-12 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 25-400mm (16.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/2.8-4.0 |
Macro focus distance | 2cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1/4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 12.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | 13.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 3840x2160 (30p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p) 1280x720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 182 gr (0.40 pounds) | 831 gr (1.83 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 137 x 99 x 131mm (5.4" x 3.9" x 5.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 64 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.1 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.7 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 517 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 360 images |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | DMW-BLC12PP |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | - |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch price | $380 | $800 |