Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic G95
94 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
67 Imaging
62 Features
88 Overall
72
Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic G95 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 182g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Released July 2009
- Additionally referred to as mju Tough 8000
(Full Review)
- 20.3MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 536g - 130 x 94 x 77mm
- Revealed April 2019
- Also Known as Lumix DMC-G90
- Earlier Model is Panasonic G85
Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic G95 Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Olympus 8000 versus Panasonic G95, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a significant gap between the sensor resolutions of the 8000 (12MP) and G95 (20.3MP) and the 8000 (1/2.3") and G95 (Four Thirds) posses totally different sensor sizes.
Photography GlossaryThe 8000 was announced 10 years before the G95 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus 8000 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic G95 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go right into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief summation of how the 8000 scores against the G95 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic G95 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-G95. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus 8000 Gallery and Panasonic G95 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 8000 over the Panasonic G95
8000 | G95 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic G95 over the Olympus 8000
G95 | 8000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | April 2019 | July 2009 | More recent by 118 months | |
Manually focus | Very precise focus | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 1240k | 230k | Sharper screen (+1010k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus 8000 and Panasonic G95
8000 | G95 |
---|
Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic G95 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to lug around your camera frequently, you need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus 8000 has got exterior dimensions of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 182 grams (0.40 lbs) while the Panasonic G95 has measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 77mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 536 grams (1.18 lbs).
Check out the Olympus 8000 versus Panasonic G95 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the 8000 vs the G95.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the 8000 and G95 is 94 and 67 respectively.
Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic G95 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very tough to visualise the difference between sensor measurements merely by reviewing a spec sheet. The photograph underneath will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the 8000 and G95.
As you can see, both of those cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The 8000 having a tinier sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field tougher and the Panasonic G95 will offer more detail with its extra 8.3 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The older 8000 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic G95 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic G95 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-G95 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-G95 |
Otherwise known as | mju Tough 8000 | Lumix DMC-G90 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Released | 2009-07-01 | 2019-04-05 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 20.3 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5184 x 3888 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 200 |
RAW support | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | - |
Macro focus distance | 2cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 1,240 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1/4 secs | 60 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Max quiet shutter speed | - | 1/16000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 9.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | 6.40 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 182 grams (0.40 lb) | 536 grams (1.18 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 130 x 94 x 77mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 290 photos |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 10 secs x 3 shots) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-II supported) |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $380 | $998 |