Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic GF2
94 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28


88 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic GF2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 182g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Additionally Known as mju Tough 8000
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 310g - 113 x 68 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2011
- Replaced the Panasonic GF1
- Later Model is Panasonic GF3

Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic GF2 Overview
In this write-up, we are looking at the Olympus 8000 versus Panasonic GF2, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the 8000 (12MP) and the GF2 (12MP) is fairly similar but the 8000 (1/2.3") and GF2 (Four Thirds) come with totally different sensor size.

The 8000 was manufactured 20 months prior to the GF2 making the cameras a generation away from each other. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus 8000 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic GF2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a short highlight of how the 8000 grades versus the GF2 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic GF2 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus 8000 Gallery and Panasonic GF2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 8000 over the Panasonic GF2
8000 | GF2 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic GF2 over the Olympus 8000
GF2 | 8000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2011 | ![]() | July 2009 | Newer by 20 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus 8000 and Panasonic GF2
8000 | GF2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic GF2 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera, you have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus 8000 has got physical measurements of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 182 grams (0.40 lbs) and the Panasonic GF2 has proportions of 113mm x 68mm x 33mm (4.4" x 2.7" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 310 grams (0.68 lbs).
Compare the Olympus 8000 versus Panasonic GF2 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have chosen at that time. Below is the front view measurements comparison of the 8000 vs the GF2.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the 8000 and GF2 is 94 and 88 respectively.

Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic GF2 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be tough to visualise the gap between sensor dimensions only by reviewing a spec sheet. The picture underneath might give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the 8000 and GF2.
Clearly, both cameras offer the same exact resolution but not the same sensor dimensions. The 8000 provides the tinier sensor which will make obtaining bokeh harder. The more aged 8000 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.

Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic GF2 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic GF2 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2 |
Also Known as | mju Tough 8000 | - |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2009-07-01 | 2011-02-24 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Venus Engine FHD |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | - |
Macro focusing range | 2cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD with wide-viewing angle |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1/4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 6.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | AVCHD, Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 182 gr (0.40 lb) | 310 gr (0.68 lb) |
Dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 113 x 68 x 33mm (4.4" x 2.7" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 54 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 21.2 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.3 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 506 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 images |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images)) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $380 | $330 |