Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic GX850
94 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6e541/6e541f13ef88ea0ca8eaf6180c7a6a686d0521cf" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 front Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ddca4/ddca4949f4a1b222603507f1ac54d6ef4e178367" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX850 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX850 front"
90 Imaging
54 Features
70 Overall
60
Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic GX850 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 182g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Launched July 2009
- Alternative Name is mju Tough 8000
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 107 x 65 x 33mm
- Released January 2017
- Additionally referred to as Lumix DMC-GX800 / Lumix DMC-GF9
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic GX850 Overview
Let's look much closer at the Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic GX850, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There is a sizeable difference between the resolutions of the 8000 (12MP) and GX850 (16MP) and the 8000 (1/2.3") and GX850 (Four Thirds) use totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The 8000 was announced 8 years prior to the GX850 which is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus 8000 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic GX850 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go in to a in depth comparison, below is a concise summation of how the 8000 matches up vs the GX850 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic GX850 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX850. The whole galleries are available at Olympus 8000 Gallery and Panasonic GX850 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 8000 over the Panasonic GX850
8000 | GX850 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic GX850 over the Olympus 8000
GX850 | 8000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2017 | ![]() | July 2009 | Newer by 91 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial exact focus | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+810k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus 8000 and Panasonic GX850
8000 | GX850 |
---|
Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic GX850 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera, you will want to consider its weight and size. The Olympus 8000 provides outside measurements of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 182 grams (0.40 lbs) and the Panasonic GX850 has specifications of 107mm x 65mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.6" x 1.3") and a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic GX850 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you choose at that time. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the 8000 compared to the GX850.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a0b7f/a0b7fddcba23237908ff1f215f95b87861e68bc3" alt="Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic GX850 size comparison Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic GX850 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the 8000 and GX850 is 94 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6c028/6c028d6dd5505a944373a21805e4d6d13e0d3a0d" alt="Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic GX850 top view buttons comparison Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic GX850 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic GX850 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its tough to see the gap between sensor dimensions only by checking specifications. The picture below will give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the 8000 and GX850.
To sum up, both of those cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The 8000 having a tinier sensor will make shooting shallow DOF trickier and the Panasonic GX850 will give extra detail with its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos a little more aggressively. The more aged 8000 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2a175/2a1758df939f8f25c649ee8f52aedd4a124d5c76" alt="Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic GX850 sensor size comparison Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic GX850 sensor size comparison"
Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic GX850 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44ecb/44ecb6012323bab1225fc16dbcdfc8a0ce5a2b2c" alt="Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic GX850 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic GX850 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic GX850 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX850 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX850 |
Also called | mju Tough 8000 | Lumix DMC-GX800 / Lumix DMC-GF9 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2009-07-01 | 2017-01-04 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4592 x 3448 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 200 |
RAW photos | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | - |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 2cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 107 |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 1,040k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1/4s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/500s |
Highest silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000s |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 4.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, on, on w/redeye reduction, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 100 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 28 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 28 Mbps, AVCHD, MTS, H.264, Dolby Digital1920 x 1080 @ 60i / 17 Mbps, AVCHD, MTS, H.264, Dolby Digital1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 20 Mbps, MP4, H.264 |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 182 gr (0.40 pounds) | 269 gr (0.59 pounds) |
Dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 107 x 65 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 73 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.2 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.3 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 586 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 210 photos |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2, 10 sec, 3 images/10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | microSD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $380 | $548 |