Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic ZS45
94 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6e541/6e541f13ef88ea0ca8eaf6180c7a6a686d0521cf" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 front Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47cc9/47cc9bc94afeaa31cc3dde1b811c34d098a7d562" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS45 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS45 front"
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic ZS45 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 182g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Launched July 2009
- Alternative Name is mju Tough 8000
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 249g - 108 x 60 x 32mm
- Released January 2015
- Additionally referred to as Lumix DMC-TZ57
- Previous Model is Panasonic ZS40
- New Model is Panasonic ZS50
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic ZS45 Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Olympus 8000 versus Panasonic ZS45, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a sizeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the 8000 (12MP) and ZS45 (16MP) but they use the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The 8000 was revealed 6 years prior to the ZS45 which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a more detailed comparison, below is a brief view of how the 8000 matches up against the ZS45 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic ZS45 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS45. The full galleries are available at Olympus 8000 Gallery and Panasonic ZS45 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 8000 over the Panasonic ZS45
8000 | ZS45 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS45 over the Olympus 8000
ZS45 | 8000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2015 | ![]() | July 2009 | Newer by 67 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+810k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 8000 and Panasonic ZS45
8000 | ZS45 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | No manual focus | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither has Touch display |
Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic ZS45 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you should take into account its weight and size. The Olympus 8000 has external measurements of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 182 grams (0.40 lbs) while the Panasonic ZS45 has specifications of 108mm x 60mm x 32mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") having a weight of 249 grams (0.55 lbs).
Check out the Olympus 8000 versus Panasonic ZS45 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you use at the time. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the 8000 against the ZS45.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b69a7/b69a7924bb0cded1bc7300622150a2e0ed55ef91" alt="Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic ZS45 size comparison Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic ZS45 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the 8000 and ZS45 is 94 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/137a5/137a54fee76ef44e163dbe26579072dbae72073e" alt="Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic ZS45 top view buttons comparison Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic ZS45 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic ZS45 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's hard to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions simply by reviewing specifications. The image below may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the 8000 and ZS45.
Plainly, both of those cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different megapixels. You should anticipate the Panasonic ZS45 to offer greater detail because of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images much more aggressively. The more aged 8000 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a8948/a89487b8499a7531f8ae926c72296596af3b3f40" alt="Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic ZS45 sensor size comparison Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic ZS45 sensor size comparison"
Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic ZS45 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a0ca4/a0ca43565e9ea73297ff4149daf1db71057ab660" alt="Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic ZS45 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic ZS45 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic ZS45 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS45 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS45 |
Other name | mju Tough 8000 | Lumix DMC-TZ57 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2009-07-01 | 2015-01-06 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 21 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focusing range | 2cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 1,040k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1/4 secs | 4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 6.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 182g (0.40 pounds) | 249g (0.55 pounds) |
Dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 108 x 60 x 32mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 350 pictures |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $380 | $300 |