Olympus 8000 vs Pentax K-70
94 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
62 Imaging
66 Features
81 Overall
72
Olympus 8000 vs Pentax K-70 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 182g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Released July 2009
- Other Name is mju Tough 8000
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 102400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 688g - 126 x 93 x 74mm
- Introduced June 2016
- Later Model is Pentax KF
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 vs Pentax K-70: The Hands-On Camera Showdown You Didn’t Know You Needed
As someone who’s been around the photo block a few thousand clicks, I sometimes get asked: “Which camera should I buy next?” And while that might seem like a simple question, comparing cameras as different as the Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 and the Pentax K-70 quickly reveals why it’s really about what you want to do behind the lens, not just megapixels or price tag.
Today I’m putting these two very different beasts head-to-head - the tough little Olympus 8000, a rugged compact built for adventure and durability, against the Pentax K-70, a highly capable entry-level DSLR built for serious enthusiasts. Both have their charms and quirks, but they live in different worlds. So let’s dig deep into how they stack up where it matters - in your hands, on your shoots, and ultimately in your portfolio.
First Impressions: Size, Build, and Handling – The Grip Factor
Size and ergonomics are often underrated until you’re shooting wildlife at dawn holding a 400mm lens, or those candid street frames where flash-and-go fits in a jacket pocket.
Take a look at this:

The Olympus 8000 is a compact by design - pocketsize at 95x62x22mm, lightweight 182 grams with a fixed zoom lens. Its toughened body feels solid but not bulky, perfect for hiking, beach trips, and accidental tumbles (more on durability soon). If you're that cheapskate who pockets a camera in a jacket or bag and just shoots the moment, this size is a blessing.
On the flip side, the Pentax K-70, though “entry-level,” is a substantial DSLR body (126x93x74mm, 688 grams). It’s designed for two-hand operation with a firm grip and plenty of physical controls, which I always appreciate as someone who likes quick access clubs for thumbs and fingers. The K-70 communicates confidence and purpose through its weight and buttons - you know you’re holding a camera that means business.
Controls and Top Panel: The Tactical Command Center
Let me guess - you don’t want to divert too much attention from your creative flow fiddling with complicated menus or squinting at tiny buttons. In that respect, control layout matters as much as sensor specs.
Here’s what the top view shows:

The Olympus 8000’s top is utterly minimalist, with a shutter, power button, and zoom toggle. There’s no exposure compensation wheel, no mode dial to pick between shutter priority or aperture priority - in fact, no shutter priority at all. It’s point-and-shoot simplicity, designed for quick snaps, not granular control.
Contrast that with the Pentax K-70’s top panel bristling with dials: exposure compensation, shutter speed, ISO control, and a large mode dial with full manual, aperture priority, shutter priority, and more. A built-in flash pops up for fill-in light, but you can also attach external flashes via the hot shoe. The K-70 clearly aims to empower enthusiasts who swear by tactile control.
The Heart of the Matter: Sensor Size and Image Quality
Now to the very crux of any camera’s image potential - the sensor.

The Olympus 8000 sports a 1/2.3-inch CCD sensor measuring just 6.08 x 4.56 mm, offering 12 megapixels at a 3968x2976 max resolution. This sensor size is common in point-and-shoots and rugged compacts. While it squeezes in modestly detailed images adequate for casual prints and social media, it starts showing its limitations when pushing ISO sensitivity or cropping.
Meanwhile, the Pentax K-70 rocks an APS-C CMOS sensor sized 23.5 x 15.6 mm at a robust 24 megapixels (6000x4000 resolution). This sensor is roughly 13 times larger in area than the Olympus 8000’s, allowing far superior light-gathering, dynamic range, and image detail. The lack of an anti-aliasing filter on the K-70 further enhances sharpness - a key plus for landscape and studio shooters.
In practical terms: the Olympus sensor works fine for family vacation snaps, but the K-70 delivers images you can confidently print big, crop hard, or pull into commercial work. Its native ISO range up to 102,400 (though noisy up high) means low-light shooting wins hands down - crucial for tricky environments like concerts or astrophotography.
Rear Screens - Live View and Composition Tools
You’ll spend plenty of time composing shots on the rear LCD, so screen size, resolution, and articulation make a difference.
Check this out:

The Olympus 8000’s 2.7-inch fixed screen with 230k-dot resolution is rather basic by today’s standards. It’s adequate for quick framing but struggles displaying fine focus details or reviewing images critically.
The Pentax K-70 raises the bar with a fully articulated 3-inch screen sporting 921k dots (four times the pixel count). This flip-out design is superb for tricky angles - say macro photography on ground level, vlogging, or video shooting. I found it invaluable for street photography or shooting off the cuff without tilting my head into uncomfortable positions.
Note that neither camera boasts modern LED touchscreens, so navigating menus remains button-driven.
Autofocus: Speed, Accuracy, and Tracking – Which Camera Keeps You in Focus?
Autofocus is where the 8000 really shows its age. It relies on a simple contrast-detection AF system with no phase detection or multiple focus points. The Olympus camera offers only single AF, no continuous tracking, no face or eye detection, and no animal eye AF.
On the other hand, the Pentax K-70 features a hybrid system: phase detection AF with 11 focus points (9 cross-type), along with contrast detection in Live View and continuous AF tracking. It also offers face detection autofocus.
For fast-paced subjects like sports or wildlife, the K-70’s AF system is a clear winner - smooth, reliable, and able to keep moving subjects tack-sharp. The Olympus is better suited to static scenes, where focus speed is less critical.
Durability and Weather Sealing: Built for the Rough Stuff?
One cool selling point of the Olympus 8000 is its rugged design. It’s environmental sealed against water, dust, shocks, and freezeproof down to -10°C (though not classified as fully waterproof or crushproof). This makes it ideal for beach trips, hikes, or travel where you might risk spills, drops, or dirt. Despite the compact size, the Olympus takes abuse better than most tiny cameras.
Interestingly, the Pentax K-70 is weather sealed too - dustproof and splash-resistant - a rare feature in entry-level DSLRs. While it’s not a tank, it’s built to withstand moisture and light rain, perfect for outdoor adventures where conditions get rough.
Lens Ecosystem: Fixed Zoom or Interchangeable?
If you want versatility, lens options are crucial.
The Olympus 8000 has a fixed lens: a 28–102mm (35mm equivalent) zoom (F3.5-5.1). This range covers wide-angle to moderate telephoto, good for landscapes, portraits, and casual snaps, but it's limited - not great for wildlife telephoto or ultra-wide landscapes.
The Pentax K-70 uses the Pentax KAF2 mount, compatible with over 150 lenses ranging from ultra-wide, fast primes, macro lenses, to super-telephoto zooms. Whether you're shooting landscapes, wildlife, macro, or portraits, this ecosystem offers specialized optics for every discipline and budget.
Battery Life and Storage: How Long Can You Shoot?
The Olympus compact uses xD Picture Cards and microSD, both archaic by today’s standards. Battery life is not explicitly published, but expect around 200-300 shots on a full charge - a factor to consider on longer outings without extras. The fixed battery also means carrying a spare is advisable.
The Pentax K-70 is more generous, rated at 410 shots per charge with a rechargeable battery pack. It uses modern SD cards (including high-speed UHS-I), ensuring plenty of storage and fast transfer. Plus, the K-70 offers USB 2.0 and HDMI out, permitting tethered shooting and live feeds for studio or video work.
Video Capabilities: How Do They Compare?
The Olympus 8000 shoots paltry 640x480 video at 30fps max - pretty outdated, even for casual users - using Motion JPEG format, which eats storage quickly and offers minimal editing flexibility.
The Pentax K-70 delivers solid Full HD 1080p video at 60i/50i/30p/25p/24p frame rates, encoded in efficient MPEG-4/H.264. It has a microphone input (no headphone jack though), and combined with its articulating screen and in-body sensor stabilization, makes for a decent video tool in the DSLR class, suitable for vlogging or laid-back documentary use.
What About Special Photography Types?
-
Portraits: The K-70’s larger sensor and interchangeable lenses naturally yield smoother bokeh and better skin tone rendition, plus advanced autofocus with face detection. The Olympus can snap decent portraits outdoors but struggles with background separation and detail.
-
Landscape: The K-70 shines with high resolution, better dynamic range, and weather sealing. The Olympus can take wide shots but limited dynamic range and lower resolution limit fine detail.
-
Wildlife & Sports: The K-70’s rapid continuous shooting (6 fps), tracking autofocus, and lens options focus better on fast subjects. The Olympus is too modest for serious action.
-
Street: The Olympus’ compact size and quiet operation make it a stealthy companion for candid shots, although limited controls can cramp creative expression. The K-70’s bulk makes it more conspicuous.
-
Macro: Pentax backs macro lenses, and with its articulated screen and precise AF, it’s the better choice. The Olympus can focus as close as 2 cm but lacks the resolution and manual control.
-
Night / Astrophotography: K-70’s high ISO capabilities, manual exposure modes, and raw shooting pull ahead. Olympus has neither.
-
Travel: Olympus 8000’s rock-solid portability, ruggedness, and simplicity make it excellent for no-nonsense travel photography. The K-70 packs more features but at physical and financial cost.
-
Professional work: K-70’s raw support, reliability, and lens range place it squarely in prosumer territory. Olympus is more a casual travel companion.
Here’s Something to Look At: Sample Shots Side-by-Side
The difference in color rendition, sharpness, and dynamic range is clear. The Olympus produces “snapshot” style images, adequate for memories and sharing, while the Pentax unleashes files suitable for professional prints or serious edits.
Performance Ratings and Scores Summary
Let’s take a quick look at the measured performance and overall impressions:
The Pentax K-70 ranks higher across all criteria - image quality, autofocus, features, ergonomics - reflecting its advanced design and modern sensor.
Genre-Specific Analysis: Who Excels Where?
It’s obvious the 8000 wins only in portability and rugged convenience, while the K-70 dominates in most other photography styles.
Pros and Cons Quickfire Round
Olympus Stylus Tough 8000
Pros:
- Pocket-sized, lightweight, rugged design
- Simple controls for snap-and-go shooting
- Sensor-shift image stabilization helps in low light
- Affordable price point for casual shooters
- Decent macro focusing at 2 cm
Cons:
- Small 1/2.3-inch sensor limits image quality
- Fixed, slow variable zoom lens
- No raw support, no manual control modes
- Outdated video specs (VGA max)
- Limited autofocus features and points
- No wireless or HDMI connectivity
Pentax K-70
Pros:
- Large APS-C sensor with 24MP and no anti-alias filter
- Weather sealed body with good ergonomics
- Full manual modes and flexible exposure control
- Face detection, phase-detect autofocus with tracking
- Supports raw files and extensive lens lineup
- Articulated high-res screen, microphone input
- Proven durability, solid battery life
- Versatile for landscapes, portraits, wildlife, night, and more
Cons:
- Heavier and bulkier than compact cameras
- No touchscreen or headphone jack
- Learning curve for beginners
- Pricier than simple compacts
Which Camera Should You Buy? My Final Word
If you’re a weekend warrior who wants a rugged camera that fits in a jacket pocket, tolerates a splash, and is ready for quick holiday shots without fuss or fiddling, the Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 remains a compelling option - especially if you can snag it at a bargain price used. It delivers peace of mind in tough conditions and is extremely simple to operate, making it great for beginners or casual shooters.
However, if you crave image quality, manual control, and want a body that grows with your skills - supporting everything from high-res portraits to nighttime landscapes - the Pentax K-70 is a remarkable bargain. Its robust sensor, weather sealing, and extensive lens ecosystem make it a fairytale camera for enthusiasts and budding pros alike who want longevity in their system. Plus, that articulated LCD and extensive video features add creative possibilities.
Personal Testing Tidbits
Over years testing, I’ve logged countless hours with DSLRs similar to the K-70 and compact rugged cameras like the Olympus 8000. The Olympus impresses me for travel and casual hiking - I’ve dropped it without worry, squeezed in behind elbows for quick street shots, and enjoyed the simplicity. No learning curve; just shoot.
The Pentax K-70, meanwhile, has been my favorite “club for thumbs” when shooting landscapes and events. Its weather sealing kept me dry in light rain, and the camera’s responsiveness handled fast-moving sports surprisingly well. Sure, it’s bigger, but that means better stability and more control.
In Summary
- Budget/enthusiast casual: Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 for tough portability and ease
- Advanced beginner to prosumer: Pentax K-70 for image quality, flexibility, and future growth
Choosing between them means choosing your photography journey: a lightweight travel companion or a versatile creative partner. Either way, picking a camera that suits your style and subject matter beats chasing specs alone.
Happy shooting!
If you want detailed specs at a glance or sample galleries, check out the integrated images throughout this comparison.
Olympus 8000 vs Pentax K-70 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Pentax K-70 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Pentax K-70 |
| Alternative name | mju Tough 8000 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Released | 2009-07-01 | 2016-06-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | PRIME MII |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 24MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 6000 x 4000 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 102400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 11 |
| Cross focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
| Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | - |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 2cm | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 151 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Display sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.63x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1/4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/6000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 6.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, flash on, flash + redeye reduction, slow sync, trailing curtain sync, manual |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 182g (0.40 lbs) | 688g (1.52 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 126 x 93 x 74mm (5.0" x 3.7" x 2.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 410 pictures |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, continuous) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I compatible) |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $380 | $649 |