Olympus 8000 vs Pentax K10D
94 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
59 Imaging
48 Features
43 Overall
46
Olympus 8000 vs Pentax K10D Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 182g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Additionally Known as mju Tough 8000
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 793g - 142 x 101 x 70mm
- Revealed December 2006
- New Model is Pentax K20D
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus 8000 vs Pentax K10D Overview
Here is a detailed analysis of the Olympus 8000 versus Pentax K10D, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Advanced DSLR by rivals Olympus and Pentax. The image resolution of the 8000 (12MP) and the K10D (10MP) is fairly comparable but the 8000 (1/2.3") and K10D (APS-C) come with different sensor sizing.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe 8000 was introduced 2 years later than the K10D and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus 8000 being a Compact camera and the Pentax K10D being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before diving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a quick overview of how the 8000 scores versus the K10D when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus 8000 vs Pentax K10D Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 and Pentax K10D. The whole galleries are available at Olympus 8000 Gallery and Pentax K10D Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 8000 over the Pentax K10D
| 8000 | K10D | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | July 2009 | December 2006 | Fresher by 31 months | |
| Display dimension | 2.7" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 210k | Sharper display (+20k dot) |
Reasons to pick Pentax K10D over the Olympus 8000
| K10D | 8000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More precise focus |
Common features in the Olympus 8000 and Pentax K10D
| 8000 | K10D | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither features Touch display |
Olympus 8000 vs Pentax K10D Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry your camera regularly, you're going to have to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus 8000 enjoys external measurements of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 182 grams (0.40 lbs) whilst the Pentax K10D has proportions of 142mm x 101mm x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") and a weight of 793 grams (1.75 lbs).
Look at the Olympus 8000 versus Pentax K10D in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are using at the time. Below is the front view over all size comparison of the 8000 versus the K10D.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the 8000 and K10D is 94 and 59 respectively.
Olympus 8000 vs Pentax K10D Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's difficult to visualize the difference in sensor sizing merely by going through technical specs. The visual underneath may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the 8000 and K10D.
As you have seen, each of the cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The 8000 using its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF more difficult and the Olympus 8000 will provide greater detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop images much more aggressively. The younger 8000 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus 8000 vs Pentax K10D Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus 8000 vs Pentax K10D Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Pentax K10D | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Pentax K10D |
| Also called as | mju Tough 8000 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced DSLR |
| Revealed | 2009-07-01 | 2006-12-15 |
| Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3872 x 2592 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
| Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | - |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 2cm | - |
| Total lenses | - | 151 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7 inch | 2.5 inch |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 210 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 1/4s | 30s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Auto Red Eye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/180s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | - |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | None |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 182g (0.40 lbs) | 793g (1.75 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 142 x 101 x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 66 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.7 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.6 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 522 |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $380 | $700 |