Olympus 8000 vs Pentax WG-1
94 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6e541/6e541f13ef88ea0ca8eaf6180c7a6a686d0521cf" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 front Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9f030/9f03013b4b6e229689ea100f87aa37abcbac60f6" alt="Pentax Optio WG-1 front Pentax Optio WG-1 front"
93 Imaging
37 Features
31 Overall
34
Olympus 8000 vs Pentax WG-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 182g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Released July 2009
- Also Known as mju Tough 8000
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 157g - 114 x 58 x 28mm
- Revealed February 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus 8000 vs Pentax WG-1 Overview
Following is a in-depth analysis of the Olympus 8000 vs Pentax WG-1, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Olympus and Pentax. The image resolution of the 8000 (12MP) and the WG-1 (14MP) is pretty comparable and they possess the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The 8000 was manufactured 19 months prior to the WG-1 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a thorough comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the 8000 grades against the WG-1 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus 8000 vs Pentax WG-1 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 and Pentax Optio WG-1. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus 8000 Gallery and Pentax WG-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 8000 over the Pentax WG-1
8000 | WG-1 |
---|
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-1 over the Olympus 8000
WG-1 | 8000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2011 | ![]() | July 2009 | More modern by 19 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial precise focusing |
Common features in the Olympus 8000 and Pentax WG-1
8000 | WG-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Equivalent screen measurement |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Exact same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither offers Touch screen |
Olympus 8000 vs Pentax WG-1 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry around your camera frequently, you need to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus 8000 offers outside dimensions of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 182 grams (0.40 lbs) and the Pentax WG-1 has sizing of 114mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 157 grams (0.35 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus 8000 vs Pentax WG-1 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are using at the time. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the 8000 against the WG-1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/455b2/455b2267250d45776ba20afff3b52447d9951c8e" alt="Olympus 8000 vs Pentax WG-1 size comparison Olympus 8000 vs Pentax WG-1 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the 8000 and WG-1 is 94 and 93 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3b668/3b668dc504112d97d0d0a336b672924f0e10cdc3" alt="Olympus 8000 vs Pentax WG-1 top view buttons comparison Olympus 8000 vs Pentax WG-1 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus 8000 vs Pentax WG-1 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very hard to see the contrast in sensor sizes merely by checking out specifications. The image underneath should give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the 8000 and WG-1.
Plainly, both of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You should expect the Pentax WG-1 to produce greater detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs far more aggressively. The more aged 8000 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8fcea/8fceab8ec4358fefe5c6aad7501c06a1f70fe9ed" alt="Olympus 8000 vs Pentax WG-1 sensor size comparison Olympus 8000 vs Pentax WG-1 sensor size comparison"
Olympus 8000 vs Pentax WG-1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/21d3e/21d3e39d1c9d7bd5c12ec1798f19996117a79106" alt="Olympus 8000 vs Pentax WG-1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus 8000 vs Pentax WG-1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus 8000 vs Pentax WG-1 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Pentax Optio WG-1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Pentax Optio WG-1 |
Also called | mju Tough 8000 | - |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Released | 2009-07-01 | 2011-02-07 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 2cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
Display resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display tech | - | TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1/4 secs | 4 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 1.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 3.90 m |
Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 182 gr (0.40 lbs) | 157 gr (0.35 lbs) |
Dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 114 x 58 x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 260 photos |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $380 | $350 |